Avodart -% side effects may not be much higher than propecia

Strat54

Established Member
Reaction score
2
The FDA has found Avodart to be safe (for BHP). The side effects were very simliar if not a tad less then Proscar 5mg, which also was cleared by the FDA many years ago. I think Avodart should be indicated as a off label prescription in some instances.

1-non-responders to Propecia
2-When the loss of efficacy of Propecia becomes bothersome to a indivdual

One other interesting point is that the age group the FDA studied on Propecia (18-42) was quite younger than what Proscar/Avodart (50+ median age 66 approx) so the chances of sexual side effects will inherently be larger in this age demographic as opposed to Propecia… meaning the side effects are probably even closer then one thinks/ Propecia versus Avodart.
The one draw back with Avodart is that there is no “human modelâ€￾ with type 1 suppression so there is a question on “long termâ€￾ safety as with many drugs. As long as you dont have any side effects with Avodart, the long half life can only be beneficial with Androgentic Alopecia and the phase 2 studies show this. People held onto the hair they gained (even grew more) 12 weeks “afterâ€￾ the the medication was discontinued (0.5 mg/ 2.5 mg only). Proscar users saw a sharp decline in this time frame. I hope these facts are helpful in some way.

From here:http://www.baldingblog.com/2005/08/29/avodart-info
 

Felk

Senior Member
Reaction score
4
I think it's a very important point that many people don't realise - Avodart wasn't tested on young people at all.

I only found this out recently actually, and it concerned me somewhat.
 

dem

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Felk said:
I think it's a very important point that many people don't realise - Avodart wasn't tested on young people at all.

I only found this out recently actually, and it concerned me somewhat.

I think that it is a general rule that minors (the young people) should have nothing to do with these drugs. It just isn't right especially if there is a chance that it may effect any development.
 
G

Guest

Guest
dem said:
Felk said:
I think it's a very important point that many people don't realise - Avodart wasn't tested on young people at all.

I only found this out recently actually, and it concerned me somewhat.

I think that it is a general rule that minors (the young people) should have nothing to do with these drugs. It just isn't right especially if there is a chance that it may effect any development.

felk was talking about men like 18-30 i think when he said young men. no company could test a drug like propecia or avodart on people under 18.

propecia's study was 18+ but avodart's wasnt.
 
Top