- Reaction score
- 36
Hi guys, please see link to study below
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4069023/
This is the one study that freaks me out since I found and I have convinced myself that if I took it, I would have the same results. I find it difficult to understand the science of it and looking for feedback on it, if what they found is conclusive how would one approach reversing it, I both don't want to or cannot accept that it would be permanent after taking 1.25 for less than a week. Also how would you get the same test done? Is that possible.
It appears that 1.4% get hit with sides and I'm in a even tinier % that got hit with an even rarer side as in numbness, most don't get that that have long term sides. How the hell is that possible, do you think the study is conclusive or is it just a theory, why didn't the Harvard one pick this up? For the record I have morning wood and night time erections fully returned just sensation is gone.
Thanks guys
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4069023/
This is the one study that freaks me out since I found and I have convinced myself that if I took it, I would have the same results. I find it difficult to understand the science of it and looking for feedback on it, if what they found is conclusive how would one approach reversing it, I both don't want to or cannot accept that it would be permanent after taking 1.25 for less than a week. Also how would you get the same test done? Is that possible.
It appears that 1.4% get hit with sides and I'm in a even tinier % that got hit with an even rarer side as in numbness, most don't get that that have long term sides. How the hell is that possible, do you think the study is conclusive or is it just a theory, why didn't the Harvard one pick this up? For the record I have morning wood and night time erections fully returned just sensation is gone.
Thanks guys