Cost of Hair Multiplication

HARVEST

New Member
Reaction score
0
Thought that the following article from the Daily Mail is interesting in terms of cost of the treatment - likely to be cheaper than transplants.....


It is a ray of hope for men limited to choosing between an unflattering comb-over, a toupee or a transplant.
British scientists are working on a new cure for baldness and are confident they will have perfected their technique by the end of the decade.
So far, the remedy, which involves a series of injections under local anaesthetic, has improved hair growth in almost three-quarters of those treated.
Researcher Dr Paul Kemp, who is using himself as a guinea-pig for the pioneering new treatment, says the results are so encouraging that soon 'baldness will be a choice'.
And the Government is so tickled by the thought of a cure for the condition that affects 7.4million British men at any one time that it has ploughed almost £2million of taxpayers' money into Dr Kemp's research.
The treatment centres around tiny scalp cells called dermal papilla cells. Found at the bottom of the hair follicle, they are responsible for the growth of new hair.
Scientists at Cambridge-based biotechnology firm Intercytex, have found a way of harvesting these cells, growing them up in the lab and then injecting them into the scalp at a point where the hair is thinning. There, the cells happily sprout new hairs.
Science Minister Lord Sainsbury believes the technique could establish the UK as a 'world leader' in research into baldness.
Dr Kemp, a biochemist, said: 'The idea is to inject the cells back into the scalp, where many of them will develop into new hair follicles.'
'Sometime in the future baldness will be a choice rather than something you have to suffer.
'Any bald people will have chosen to be bald.
'There is huge potential in the market. Analysts estimate that a good baldness treatment could be worth £1 billion a year in Britain and many times that worldwide.'
The treatment, which is still experimental, could end severe hair loss in older people and thinning on top for the young.
Intercytex says the technique is quicker, less painful, and, crucially, gives better results, than conventional hair transplants. It is also likely to be cheaper than the current transplants which cost up to £10,000.
These transplants generally take two eight-hour sessions under local anaesthetic. The results are often patchy, with patients complaining the relocated hair looks unnatural and 'tufty.'
With the new technique, a small section of hair and skin is removed during a 30-minute operation carried out under local anaesthetic.
The hair is taken from the side of the head, where the follicles tend to live longer - and so produce hair later in life - than those on the top of the scalp.
The sample is then taken to the lab, where the dermal papilla cells are separated out and coaxed into multiplying in flasks.
After two months, the patient returns to the clinic to have the lab-grown cells injected into his bald patch, again under anaesthetic.
But it is not all good news for those with thinning barnets. A typical bare pate would currently need around 1,000 injections. with each jab penetrating 3mm into the skin.
Three months later, new hair should start to poke its way through the previously bald skin.
In early trials, five out of seven men treated experienced hair growth. Larger-scale trials, boosted by a £1.9million grant from the Department of Trade and Industry, are underway.
Male-pattern baldness affects two-thirds of men as they get older, and despite, being a supposed sign of virility, it can have a devastating effect on self-esteem.
Earlier this year, LibDem MP Mark Oaten blamed his midlife crisis and ensuing sex scandal on losing his hair.
 

DaSand

Established Member
Reaction score
3
No one honestly knows, it will be expensive at first but as more demand comes for TRC, the price will go down. They said it would cost less than a transplant, but that is very vague because depending on how bad your hair is it will cost various amounts of money.
 

elguapo

Experienced Member
Reaction score
0
What is the most expensive hair transplant you've heard of? Or are we also considering those of us who have had multiple transplants, in which case the final cost of multiple procedures, each costing, say, 3 or 4K, might total to the amount of 20K?

I don't know. I think it is based on grafts/number of follicles transplanted. And I think there is a maximum that can be taken from the donor area and transplanted onto the scalp.

I think HM will cost between 10K and 15K. That's just my guess.
 

Hammy070

Established Member
Reaction score
0
I'm going university full time next year (part time now) to do molecular science, I'm gonna ask if I can grow my hair as a project hehe....then it'll be free! :mrgreen:
 

DaSand

Established Member
Reaction score
3
I don't really know elquapo, but an hair transplant can get up high to $20,000 I believe depending on your Norwood Level.
 

ANDREW_J_I

Experienced Member
Reaction score
0
i think that if it cost around 5000, it would be in huuumugous demand and very affordable....
 

DaSand

Established Member
Reaction score
3
ANDREW_J_I said:
i think that if it cost around 5000, it would be in huuumugous demand and very affordable....

That sounds pretty reasonable... With a lot of balding customers from around the world, they'll rake in dough like there's no tomorrow.
 

CCS

Senior Member
Reaction score
27
Some other british newspaper article someone posted on here said it would initially cost $20,000-90,000, with $20,000 for smaller procedures. I doubt it will ever drop below $5,000 unless there is some other cure. Propecia works for the very young, and usually anyone older than that can come up with at least $5,000. I think many 40 year olds will refinance there houses to pay for the $90,000 if it gives them a NW1.
 

DaSand

Established Member
Reaction score
3
That's the thing with newspapers ccs, did they get this information from Intercytex?
 

RaginDemon

Senior Member
Reaction score
3
fellas, its so far away from us, dont get your hope up.
 

DaSand

Established Member
Reaction score
3
How is it so far away? They're in the middle of Phase II trials. Why would a company wait so many years to release their product? It doesn't make economic sense.
 

hairsucks

Established Member
Reaction score
1
I don't think It's far away at all. Next few years, I reckon.

It's the only thing worth building your hopes up, in regards to hair.
 
Top