Mitko I agree with a lot of the conclusions you have come up with, to do with craniofacial development, galea shape, scalp tension etc. However, when it comes to strictly speaking about the attractiveness scale from 1-10, your system is incredibly flawed. To begin, the way you see craniofacial development is very different to the average person. The average person sees good bone structure as striking, well developed bones, typically found in models anyway. Henry cavill for example is known for having incredible bone structure, even stated by Mike Mew himself. This is because he has a very dense, thick jawline, with a squarish nature. Another example is Taylor Hill. You rated her as a 5 or something, yet to the vast majority of people, she has an incredible facial structure, there's a reason she's a model.
But besides that, Mitko take no offence in this, but to the average person, you look completely average looking or 5/10. Even though you believe your craniofacial structure is 8/10, to the average person it would be a 5/10. Now in terms of mechanical tension and hair loss, your craniofacial development may well be 8/10, however in the realm of aesthetics, it is no more than a 5/10 (again I'm speaking about how the vast majority of people would view your facial structure). An example of a 10 in terms of aesthetics for craniofacial development would be somebody like Henry Cavill. But there is far more to attractiveness than solely craniofacial development anyway. If you really want to get into he field of facial aesthetics, there is so much more you have to account for, such as soft features (eyes, hair, eyebrows, lips, skin, colouring,) and harmony (overall ratios of the face).