David Sinclair Is Working On Hair Regeneration

Ivo Shandor

Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
5
Nice!
 

x4342

New Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
9
I'm curious, do you have any examples of when he did please?

The standard stuff. What you see with any "anti-aging" or hair loss stuff.
Ridiculous promises that are always "5 years away" while you get paid.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“It’s a great gig if you can convince people to send money and use it to pay exorbitant salaries and do it for 20 years and make claims for 10,” Olshansky said. “You’ve lived the high life and get investors by whipping up excitement and saying the benefits will come sooner than they really are.”

Research by Sinclair and others helped spark interest in resveratrol, an ingredient in red wine, for its potential anti-aging properties. In 2004, Sinclair co-founded a company, Sirtris, to test resveratrol’s potential benefits and declared in an interview with the journal Science it was “as close to a miraculous molecule as you can find.” GlaxoSmithKline bought the company in 2008 for $720 million. By the time Glaxo halted the research in 2010 because of underwhelming results with possible side effects, Sinclair had already received $8 million from the sale, according to Securities and Exchange Commission documents. He also had earned $297,000 a year in consulting fees from the company, according to The Wall Street Journal.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resveratrol in a pill would that make you young and on top cure all possible diseases like diabetes and even cancer) via the (never confirmed, but often postulated) process of activation of SIRT enzymes, or sirtuins. These are NAD-dependent deacetylases of various proteins involved in cancer and sensescence, which led Sinclair and Guarente to another commercial idea, namely that of NAD+ as SIRT1 activator, marketable as dietary supplement.

Sinclair sold Sirtis to the pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for $700 million, which made him and Guarente very, very rich. GSK however soon regretted the purchase and abandoned the SIRT research. The snag was hit long before any pharmacological efficiency could be tested in vivo, namely with achieving any significant bio-availability of resveratrol. It is not clear if the lead product SRT501 ever delivered anything. On top of that, one of Sirtris’ original founders Christoph Westphal had to resign when GSK found out he was selling same SRT501 supplements via his own private company. Sirtis then tried its luck with alternative supplements (SRT2104 and SRT1720) but that led nowhere either (there were rumours of toxicity), so GSK pulled the plug completely.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




This should all seem very familiar. Eg: Christiano, Naughton, etc..
Charisma, hype, and business acumen are generally more valuable than pure science.
 

DuncanOP

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
29
The standard stuff. What you see with any "anti-aging" or hair loss stuff.
Ridiculous promises that are always "5 years away" while you get paid.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“It’s a great gig if you can convince people to send money and use it to pay exorbitant salaries and do it for 20 years and make claims for 10,” Olshansky said. “You’ve lived the high life and get investors by whipping up excitement and saying the benefits will come sooner than they really are.”

Research by Sinclair and others helped spark interest in resveratrol, an ingredient in red wine, for its potential anti-aging properties. In 2004, Sinclair co-founded a company, Sirtris, to test resveratrol’s potential benefits and declared in an interview with the journal Science it was “as close to a miraculous molecule as you can find.” GlaxoSmithKline bought the company in 2008 for $720 million. By the time Glaxo halted the research in 2010 because of underwhelming results with possible side effects, Sinclair had already received $8 million from the sale, according to Securities and Exchange Commission documents. He also had earned $297,000 a year in consulting fees from the company, according to The Wall Street Journal.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resveratrol in a pill would that make you young and on top cure all possible diseases like diabetes and even cancer) via the (never confirmed, but often postulated) process of activation of SIRT enzymes, or sirtuins. These are NAD-dependent deacetylases of various proteins involved in cancer and sensescence, which led Sinclair and Guarente to another commercial idea, namely that of NAD+ as SIRT1 activator, marketable as dietary supplement.

Sinclair sold Sirtis to the pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for $700 million, which made him and Guarente very, very rich. GSK however soon regretted the purchase and abandoned the SIRT research. The snag was hit long before any pharmacological efficiency could be tested in vivo, namely with achieving any significant bio-availability of resveratrol. It is not clear if the lead product SRT501 ever delivered anything. On top of that, one of Sirtris’ original founders Christoph Westphal had to resign when GSK found out he was selling same SRT501 supplements via his own private company. Sirtis then tried its luck with alternative supplements (SRT2104 and SRT1720) but that led nowhere either (there were rumours of toxicity), so GSK pulled the plug completely.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




This should all seem very familiar. Eg: Christiano, Naughton, etc..
Charisma, hype, and business acumen are generally more valuable than pure science.
Haha, you evidenced him as a scammer. Nice point. I'm still cheering for the best. But for sure I don't have any type of cure expectation, in fact.
I agree. It is a clear a "hype longevity interventions with insufficient evidence" as you said.
 

Chads don't bald

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
107
Epigenetic reprogramming could actually work though, I believe Sinclair's lab is working with epigenetic reprogramming
 

trialAcc

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,531
Don't hold your breath, David Sinclair is the Elon Musk of science, he makes allot of big claims and delivers little.
Elon Musk delivers little? Are you just dumb or did you buy tesla stock at the peak or something? The guy is at the front of literally 3-4 of the most advanced industries/companies on the planet, and juggling them at the same time.

Much like Elon, Sinclair just gets excited (almost to a fault) and happens to get people who listen/follow them excited in the process. Then something doesn't happen in the typical person's attention span and they feel misled or like Musk/Sinclair are full of sh*t. In reality they are both moving the needle at a much faster pace then their peers.
 

eeyore

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
211
Haven't heard of Sinclair before, has he actually delivered on/commercialized anything significant?
 

Seuxin

Experienced Member
Reaction score
356
male pattern baldness is not related to aging, and this David Sinclair is just a scammer.
 

pegasus2

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,512
male pattern baldness is not related to aging, and this David Sinclair is just a scammer.
The older you get the more susceptible you are to it so of course aging is involved as it is in most things. If you give a young eunuch testosterone he loses hair. If you give an old eunuch testosterone he loses hair more rapidly.
 

trialAcc

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,531
Haven't heard of Sinclair before, has he actually delivered on/commercialized anything significant?
He sold one of his startups/health compounds Resveratrol to GSK for like 700 million, however GSK shelved the development & research if I'm not mistaken due to renal toxicology concerns.

I wouldn't say he's actually "delivered" on anything yet beyond a substantial amount of research and publicity into longevity studies, but he's working in a field where delivery of something significant is very complicated but will improve the lives of billions of people on a continuous basis.

How many times have you heard of someone delivering in the field of extending human life? It's probably happened a handful of times, like the discovery of antibiotics, but otherwise wasn't even really considered a potential scientific pursuit until recent decades.
 

Chads don't bald

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
107
Arguably he's already delivered when he restored a mice's damaged optic nerve using epigenetic reprogramming.

This is a big breakthrough in biology where we can use yamanaka factors to reverse epigenetic changes to cells due to age. I wouldn't be surprised if epigenetic changes are responsible for declining hair quality with age.
 

jake_b

Established Member
Reaction score
43
The idea that David Sinclair is a scammer is ridiculous. Making money talking about the subject you’re an expert in is not a

He promotes longetivity research… well no duh, he runs one of the most prominent longetivity labs in world. When he talks about nmn or resveratrol he gets $0 even though he could very easily start or endorse a supplement brand and make millions.

His lab recently published a paper that was the cover paper for the most prestigious journal Nature showing that nerve cells can be regenerated.

I guess some people think scientists should never talk about anything until the science is fully baked, but here we all are in a forum that pores over mice studies looking for hair loss clues. The research he talks about is very often more developed than the things I’ve seen people here do group buys from
China based on.
 

morehairmoredates

New Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
0
He got $700 M to promote resveratrol as a supplement, you don't think he has a financial incentive to promote this stuff?
 
Top