I am suffering from Receding Hairline and I am planning to have a hair transplantation on the temples in the beginning of August with DIRECT HAIR IMPLANTATION COMPANY but I haven´t found any patient reviews or customer
who had undergone a hair transplantation with this company.
I am not so confident about the hair transplant follicles whether they grow or not when they have been implanted from donor area to the recipient area using direct hair implantation technique.
I am scary and I am not so sure regarding the result of direct hair implantation technique.
The attractive thing of this company is the the low cost procedure they offer.
The small session costs 2350 euro. I have paid in advanced 500 euro.
This company advertises that the DHI technique is superior and the best of all (among FUE, STRIP SURGERY), in the followings?
a) It says that there is immediate implantation.
b) It has more quantity of hair.
c) It has natural result.
d) It has no scarring
e) It has no pain.
f) The results timeframe are permanent.
g) You can return to work on the same day.
h) There is no scalp incision.
i)There is no handling on the hair follicle to implant.
j) The hair is out of the body only for few seconds.
l)It has training certification protocols.
m) It has accreditations.
ADVANTAGES OF THE TECHNIQUE AS WRITTEN IN THE COMPANY´S WEBSITE
Smaller diameter punches (0.7-0.85 mm) lead to faster healing & less marks.
Direct implantation of grafts without receptions results in less trauma of the skin, less damage to the local blood supply and no scarring.
Less invasive.
Less traumatic.
Significantly reduced bleeding.
Minimal risk of infection as the hair follicles are transferred immediately from the donor area to the recipient area.
Less scarring after the procedure.
No microscope needed, so that the exposure of the hair follicles in intense light & heat is avoided.
No handling of the grafts is required, thus increasing the survival of the hair follicles.
Less tiring for the patient (seated position).
Diminished desiccation of the grafts (minimal time out of the skin).
Less anesthesia, less medication needed.
Increased graft survival.
Early hair growth as most transferred hair follicles enter the anagen phase immediately.
Are all the above real?
Who knows?
Is it a famous and well known company for the results it can achieve?
Is this technique successful?
Do you advice me to have hair transplant with this company?
Is it risky if I have hair transplant with this company?
Are the results 100% GARANTEED AND THE HEALING PROCESS VERY FAST?
WHAT DO YOU ADVISE ME AND SUGGEST ME TO DO?
HELP ME PLEASE. GIVE ME YOUR OPINION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
who had undergone a hair transplantation with this company.
I am not so confident about the hair transplant follicles whether they grow or not when they have been implanted from donor area to the recipient area using direct hair implantation technique.
I am scary and I am not so sure regarding the result of direct hair implantation technique.
The attractive thing of this company is the the low cost procedure they offer.
The small session costs 2350 euro. I have paid in advanced 500 euro.
This company advertises that the DHI technique is superior and the best of all (among FUE, STRIP SURGERY), in the followings?
a) It says that there is immediate implantation.
b) It has more quantity of hair.
c) It has natural result.
d) It has no scarring
e) It has no pain.
f) The results timeframe are permanent.
g) You can return to work on the same day.
h) There is no scalp incision.
i)There is no handling on the hair follicle to implant.
j) The hair is out of the body only for few seconds.
l)It has training certification protocols.
m) It has accreditations.
ADVANTAGES OF THE TECHNIQUE AS WRITTEN IN THE COMPANY´S WEBSITE
Smaller diameter punches (0.7-0.85 mm) lead to faster healing & less marks.
Direct implantation of grafts without receptions results in less trauma of the skin, less damage to the local blood supply and no scarring.
Less invasive.
Less traumatic.
Significantly reduced bleeding.
Minimal risk of infection as the hair follicles are transferred immediately from the donor area to the recipient area.
Less scarring after the procedure.
No microscope needed, so that the exposure of the hair follicles in intense light & heat is avoided.
No handling of the grafts is required, thus increasing the survival of the hair follicles.
Less tiring for the patient (seated position).
Diminished desiccation of the grafts (minimal time out of the skin).
Less anesthesia, less medication needed.
Increased graft survival.
Early hair growth as most transferred hair follicles enter the anagen phase immediately.
Are all the above real?
Who knows?
Is it a famous and well known company for the results it can achieve?
Is this technique successful?
Do you advice me to have hair transplant with this company?
Is it risky if I have hair transplant with this company?
Are the results 100% GARANTEED AND THE HEALING PROCESS VERY FAST?
WHAT DO YOU ADVISE ME AND SUGGEST ME TO DO?
HELP ME PLEASE. GIVE ME YOUR OPINION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
