Disposable hair transplant

[xtracrispy]

Has anyone ever considered the idea of a disposable hair transplant?

Say you have really slow recession, or have a really far-reaching but narrow temple recession that can be covered up with say 100 follicles.

Would it be reasonable then, to do the small hair transplant to look great for 5-10 years, and hope it stabilizes?

And worse case, if it keeps going back... remove them and go back to looking naturally bald without being on drugs or looking like a freak?

 

[Guest]

No-- the grafts are very small--- to remove all of via fue them would almost assuredly leave visible scarring.

Do not over-estimate hair transplantation--- for most the illusion of density is the best we can hope for.

Take your time and consider all angles.

Take Care,
Jason

 

[xtracrispy]

I meant something simpler...even NAIR or laser hair removal, haha.

Hence "disposable".

The whole idea is to stretch things a few years, and then stop caring all together. Presumably when you're already old and have nothing left to live for.

 

[jakeb]

The whole idea is to stretch things a few years, and then stop caring all together. Presumably when you're already old and have nothing left to live for.

Ah, but there's the illusion. That hairloss is bad *now*, but in 10 years you won't care. You'll care. The only reason why it seems like older people don't care is because they've had longer to get over it it and come to terms with it.

Now depending on how lucky you feel about HM coming out and actually working in the next 10 years, well...