If the lower earners were taxed more, and the high earners taxed less, would the higher earners then be pushed by market forces to pay the low earners more, so that the take home pays were back to where they were before? I mean if the change occured gradually enough not to have a rough transition period.
I'm sure that anyone looking at the tax rebate they got would say they needed it. But my question is whether their take home pay would have been higher had their boss not been taxed as much. I think it takes a few months for a company to fully respond to new tax rates, so employees may draw inaccurate conclusions from initial changes.
I'm sure that anyone looking at the tax rebate they got would say they needed it. But my question is whether their take home pay would have been higher had their boss not been taxed as much. I think it takes a few months for a company to fully respond to new tax rates, so employees may draw inaccurate conclusions from initial changes.