waynakyo
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 466
I was not aware of that. Results are posted here:
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/resu ... #outcome29
Funny how the sexual side effect did not seem that prevalent at all.
Furthermore if you look through the numbers you can definitely see that significant shed must have happened for SOME individuals as the standard error (variation) is too large even at 6 month.
Trends are difficult to discern however it seems that it does help.
I think they should have continued the study or 2 years or so. Or they should follow up with those who decide to stay on it.
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/resu ... #outcome29
Funny how the sexual side effect did not seem that prevalent at all.
Furthermore if you look through the numbers you can definitely see that significant shed must have happened for SOME individuals as the standard error (variation) is too large even at 6 month.
Trends are difficult to discern however it seems that it does help.
I think they should have continued the study or 2 years or so. Or they should follow up with those who decide to stay on it.
