Ex-Pharma Sales Reps Speaks Out

northnorth

Member
Reaction score
6
wait a minute

are you saying that drug companies that make billions every year aren't looking for a cure for any drug?

modern day socrates right there
 

ripple-effect

Experienced Member
Reaction score
11
Yes, there was a very promising cure for cancer that was discovered that Big Pharma refuses to fund the research for because they will make no money off it if they do.
 

twenty.five

Established Member
Reaction score
1
I would like my doctor to give me placebos, but if I ask for them, then the placebo effect won't work.
 
T

TravisB

Guest
The same thing as with this cancer cure, goes on the hair loss market. Big Pharma (Merck) is holding the market by its balls. Everything in this world is curable, it's just not in their business to cure it.
 

squeegee

Banned
Reaction score
132
AMAZING! that discovery was made where I live right now.. Edmonton, Alberta Canada! fairly cheap also! I hope this get out there and help a lot of people going to chemo therapy route.. f*** FDA and the pharma industry
 

RP3X

Established Member
Reaction score
10
wow incredible news, considering my dad passed away 4 years ago from bladder cancer and knowing it was the chemo side effects that made life unbearable for him this medicine needs to be tested asap.

Seems every month I hear from a friend of a friend there mum or dad or sister, brother passed away from cancer, this is more important then hair loss !
 

abcdefg

Senior Member
Reaction score
782
Coming back to reality lets all remember that old saying if its too good to be true it probably is. So here is that medical buzzword that sounds straight out of star trek no one watching this knows anything about. So this guy has studies published which anyone who believes they cured cancer would of course do. No scientist can reproduce his results so I guess other scientists are incompetent or what he does is magic maybe he uses a magic powder left out of his study so one can cure anymore cancers. Give me a break big pharma out to kill us all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antineoplaston

"The clinical efficacy of antineoplastons combinations for various diseases have been the subject of many such trials by Burzynski and his associates, but these have not produced any clear evidence of efficacy. Oncologists have described these studies as flawed, with one doctor stating that they are "scientific nonsense".[5] In particular, independent scientists have been unable to reproduce the positive results reported in Burzynski's studies.[6]"
 

abcdefg

Senior Member
Reaction score
782
monty1978 said:
That's cos they didn't follow his exact protocol. How do you explain the scores of terminally ill cancer patients that he treated going into full remission and still being alive today.

you dont think big pharma would attempt to discredit someone like Dr Buryznsky if they invented an unpatentable cancer treatment? Cos big buiness would never do such a thing right. Tell that to the local famers being put out of business by monsanto, who are f****ing with the planets DNA or the maybe the reps who tried to set up unions to improve workers rights for employees of coca cola in Columbia and the like. The list goes on.......

Bloody sheep, do you think those families are crying in happiness and sadness for their loved ones and some who have dedicated their life to their cause are deluded or doing it for fun.

Open you eyes to what's around you

Alright just that first sentence you said about independant scientists not following his protocol that he published in a medical journal which is a scientific journal as described below. Notice the bold sentence that is an important one so explain again to me how independent researchers are unable to verify his results?

Although scientific journals are superficially similar to professional magazines, they are actually quite different. Issues of a scientific journal are rarely read casually, as one would read a magazine. The publication of the results of research is an essential part of the scientific method. If they are describing experiments or calculations, they must supply enough details that an independent researcher could repeat the experiment or calculation to verify the results. Each such journal article becomes part of the permanent scientific record.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_journal
 
T

TravisB

Guest
If FDA is so bad and corrupt, why won't the companies try to introduce their treatments to Europe (EMA)? Maybe in Europe it's easier to introduce new drugs?
 
Top