- Reaction score
- 1
Hey, so I'm 22 and I'm a Norwood 2 approaching 3. I've tried finasteride at 1, 0.5 and 0.25mg when I was 19 and had to stop about 3 weeks in due to nipple pain/ache (my brother also experienced clear gyno symptoms around 3 months in). I decided to try again now and I've got the same issue, so I was thinking this:
Continue taking finasteride, in the event I get full blown gyno, pay the $5-$6k that it is to have the glands completely removed. It appears that gyno is really the only side effect I or my brother have gotten. My reasoning here is that going bald for the next 8ish years and therefore for all of my 20's, then having to shell out $10k or more for transplants that likely won't even restore my hair to current density is far worse than paying the $6k now to have some glands removed. I'm at pretty low body fat so the procedure would be just gland removal, of course this entire plan requires a surgeon experienced with full gland removals while maintaining pec shape (probably the ones that work with bodybuilders that juice).
I could totally have no clue what I'm talking about, and would love any insight on whether I'm thinking about this all wrong. I really value my hair and having thought it over for a few years now, believe that this risk makes sense. Thanks in advance.
(currently on .25mg daily for the past 3 weeks, right nipple ache came in hard so I dropped to .125-ish mg and it's gone down a bit)
Also, is buying CB and/or Seti a reasonable/somewhat proven alternative for at least maintenance? I assume that $5-6k I'm willing to spend would get me through a few years?
Continue taking finasteride, in the event I get full blown gyno, pay the $5-$6k that it is to have the glands completely removed. It appears that gyno is really the only side effect I or my brother have gotten. My reasoning here is that going bald for the next 8ish years and therefore for all of my 20's, then having to shell out $10k or more for transplants that likely won't even restore my hair to current density is far worse than paying the $6k now to have some glands removed. I'm at pretty low body fat so the procedure would be just gland removal, of course this entire plan requires a surgeon experienced with full gland removals while maintaining pec shape (probably the ones that work with bodybuilders that juice).
I could totally have no clue what I'm talking about, and would love any insight on whether I'm thinking about this all wrong. I really value my hair and having thought it over for a few years now, believe that this risk makes sense. Thanks in advance.
(currently on .25mg daily for the past 3 weeks, right nipple ache came in hard so I dropped to .125-ish mg and it's gone down a bit)
Also, is buying CB and/or Seti a reasonable/somewhat proven alternative for at least maintenance? I assume that $5-6k I'm willing to spend would get me through a few years?