Are those before and after pics on the revivogen website for real. If so then I would say that revivogen is the best hairloss solution, unless they were taking something else at the same time.......I dont know but they had some major growth......
Ok but I would imagine that every product uses the best reponders for their pictures, even propecia, so just from these pictures, revivogen is a better product than every other one, no other solution boasts results such as these http://revivogen.com/pictures.html hmmm.....I should drop the propecia and add revivogen......
Looks like a scam to me. See how they change the angle at which the picture is taken to make it look like the person had more hair in the 2nd shot? They wouldent need to do that if it was for real.
Ok but I would imagine that every product uses the best reponders for their pictures, even propecia, so just from these pictures, revivogen is a better product than every other one, no other solution boasts results such as these.
Well it is true that all the products use there best responders for their pictures, but they also show the others too. For propecia they show the best responders and give you a % of how many had that good of results. Then they show guys with moderate results and slight results. Take a look for yourself. http://www.propecia.com/propecia/cns/about/results.html
Revivogen just shows a few guys and does not even give you a % of how many will see results like this. Those guys could be 1%. Only 1% of guys may get those results on revivogen. who knows. I think its a scam.
Well lets say its not a scam. I still don't think its the best treatment option out there. There are no numbers and those results are probably not typical.
Cant you guys tell that there is virtually no difference in hair loss between the pictures? All they did was take the pictures from a different angle.
Look at the first guy - in the before pic the camera is directly on top of his frontal region, but in the second pic the camera is angled so that you are looking at the back of his head, where even in the first pic you can tell he has much more coverage.
The second guy the light is directly above the guys bald spot in the before pic, so you get a nice shiny reflection in the scalp. But in the second picture they have tilted his head down in a similar fashon to the first guy so that the light angle produces little or no shine from his bald spot. Look at his scalp though, with the exception of the shine, the hairloss is virtually identical.
The third guy his hair appears wetted down in the before pic and once again the light is directly above his balding region. The second pic the hairloss looks improved, but its difficult to tell how much because of the changed camera angle and the lighting.