How accurate is Nick Shell's 12 months/1yr old theory?

[jackm415]

Just looked at my old pictures from 12 months and 17 months and I'm kinda torn, how accurate were your pictures at age 1 to your hairline as an adult (theoretically around age 35)

 

[notsohairymon]

Not at all. I was BORN with a lot of hair for a newborn baby and I ended up a Norwood 6 by 30.

 

[jackm415]

Not at all. I was BORN with a lot of hair for a newborn baby and I ended up a Norwood 6 by 30.

Yeah I had quite a lot of hair as well, looking at pictures and talking with my parents apparently I had even more than my sister. I was hoping that would be a good sign, but who knows. I'm just trying to predict if I'll go bald in the future. So far at 20 I think I am OK with a NW0.5/1. Most of my family members have really good hair genetics except for my maternal grandpa, who started balding after 30 and is a NW5 iirc. Dad has identical hairline to me at age 50.

 

[Jpw1999]

Nick Shell is a mentalist

 

[joeblack2017]

Yeah this Nick Shell guy is a con. He's all about making money. He has nothing to do to help with hairloss, but just brainwashing you to accept it if you're balding, which is not a bad advice at all. But we all end up here in this forum to find a solution that will maybe work for us, so it you're still on your hairloss battle and want to fight, don't watch his videos. If you're thinking of buzzing it off, then watch him.