Racism is sure thing in some countries..okay..every onr knows about that..
If you take Racism in context of visual point of view..
all beautiful and handsome people can make friends too easily,they can be popular too easily,there bllsihts are tolerated by everyone,
but if you are not good luking,every step is a struggle.
Making friends with female becomes too dificult when they are not in your field,
while any good looking person can do it with a charm..
Bald means Ugly to many people,no matter how damned your face is.
We at Hairloss Talk speak this look better bald,that look better bald.
Many people will never take names of such heroes in first place.
Many female friends knows about heroes in hollywood like christian bale,leo di caprio,even Neo of matrix,but they will never talk about any bald actor.
If was not bald,i 100% guarentee will have never taken name of jason statum in first place,
his only movie i seen is Death Race.
I totally 100% agree with what you have said.
- - - Updated - - -
LOL, none of the white guys you posted look good bald. They don't look terrible, but would look much better with hair. Especially Billy Zane.
I feel that the degree of attractiveness for bald Billy Zane, bald Yul Brynner, NW5 Ed Harris is comparable to that of the black man in the picture submitted by Norwood as his proof that ALL black men look good bald. The only reason the black man's picture feels more attractive than the white men's pictures is that the black man is wearing feminine looking clothing, which enhances his attractiveness. The glamour lighting and air-brushing in the black man's photo also adds to the ambiance of attractiveness in the photo. The black man's picture is a glamour-photo. The lighting in the pictures of Yul Brynner, Billy Zane, and Ed Harris is plain lighting. There is no air-brushing in the photos of the white men - look how visible Yul Brynner's wrinkles are. The pics of the white guys are plain pictures, not glamour photos. If you take the glamour lighting, air brushing, and feminine clothing from the black mans picture then he would look no better than Zane, Brynner, or Harris.
I agree that Billy Zane, Yul Brynner, and Ed Harris look better with full heads of hair, especially Billy Zane, but the same holds true for Bill Cosby, OJ Simpson, and Terrance Williams the 3rd. My point is that the attractiveness of black men in general, the same as white men in general, is damaged profoundly by hair loss. Some of the white posters here are suggesting that black men are less deserving of empathy over their hair loss than white men are. They're suggesting that black men's hair is less valuable than white men's hair. They're suggesting that white men deserve treatment for their hair loss more than black man do. I totally disagree.
In general, the people of all demographics (race/gender) lose a life-changing amount of attractiveness as a result of baldness even if some individuals in each demographic don't lose as much attractiveness as other members of that specific demographic. In other words, while some women may retain a modicum of attractiveness after hair loss that is not true of women in general. I've seen lots of bald, unattractive, rough-looking black guys just like I've seen a lot of bald, unattractive, rough-looking white guys. Some white posters here are inventing reasons why they deserve more empathy over their hair loss than people of other demographic(s) do. Check out the below link to see how damaged black men's looks can be from hair loss. Scroll down to my post that contains before and after pics of Bill Cosby, Clarence Williams the 3rd, and OJ Simpson. These guys have suffered SEVERE cosmetic damage.
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/interac...-Tutorial-How-to-get-laid-as-a-bald-man/page8
- - - Updated - - -
Hair is better than bald. :hairy:
I don't understand what this whole thing that's been going around that a certain race looks particularly better than the other bald. It just doesn't make sense to me.
I know. And it sounds racist to me. It sounds to me like some bald white guys are inventing a phony justification to claim that they have a heavier burden in regards to their hair loss than the members of entire other demographic(s) do. They're inventing phony reasons why they deserve more compassion in regards to their hair loss than the people of other demographic(s) do. Their point is that because they are white men they deserve a cure more than the people of other demographic(s). Give me a break.