nothing would change... the dateless will remain dateless... that is the way it is with all of those hypothesises...
if everyone has perfect hair, they go for height/skin/race/fingernails/eyelashes...
lets say now apparently 60% of all men loose hair and that wouldnt be the case, then nobody would have ever cared about hair and they would care about something else that is out of anybodies control...
the only way any of this is going to stop is when nobody cares about looks anymore and really just goes for character as they always pretend...
but i guess that means you would have to date fatties/manlets/baldies/single mums..
that is what im saying for ages...what I find ironic is how people on here are complaining that women don’t go for them cos they are bald and having preferences, yet discriminating against fatties for being fat and undatable
The difference is one you have control over and the other you don't unless you act quickly and respond well.that is what im saying for ages...
i also still say bald men and fat women are most likely just looksmatches, like if you ask a woman whats the worst and ask men whats the worst, i wouldnt be surprised if those are the answers...
Plot twist:The difference is one you have control over and the other you don't unless you act quickly and respond well.
I'd rather be 200 lbs overweight than have balding genes because I would do something about my weight and it is guaranteed to work. But finasteride isn't guaranteed to work because 10% of the people on the drug still lost hair.
system or transplant (if still possible)...The difference is one you have control over and the other you don't unless you act quickly and respond well.
I'd rather be 200 lbs overweight than have balding genes because I would do something about my weight and it is guaranteed to work. But finasteride isn't guaranteed to work because 10% of the people on the drug still lost hair.
If you have the genetics to wind up as a norwood 6 or 7 then you are screwed if you don't stop it.system or transplant (if still possible)...
also doesnt change the fact that balding men and fat women might be equally unattractive...
most likely fat women are as often going to be slim as bald men are going to get hair...
thats why you stop it... if that doesnt work, system, or egg...If you have the genetics to wind up as a norwood 6 or 7 then you are screwed if you don't stop it.
Idiotic postDepends on your norwood level. But in general I would say yes. Western societies are shifting towards hypergamous/ polyamorous dating structures, especially for the young age bracket.
Don't wanna go into incel territory, but it's not really that removed from reality to say that many young women prefer to share one sexual partner with many other women instead of dating someone ugly/significantly less attractive. So if a good portion of men turned more attractive the dating pool of these women in question would just increase, without it being a complete zero sum game.
How could I ever explain the existence of married couples, after stating that many young women live a certain lifestyle...think retard, think.Idiotic post
then explain all of the monogamous married couples?
This post is actually accurate. I think female hypergamy wouldn't be about 80% of women going for the top 20% of men, it would be like 80% going for top 30-35% of men.Idiotic post
then explain all of the monogamous married couples?
I disagree. Before you didn't have dating options on a handheld device it had to be through connections.i wonder why people think that now women are all poly/hyper...
they always went for rich dudes and better looking dudes if they could and i dont mean that in a negative way...
men did and do the same, they usually just think they are way more attractive than they actually are...
and people always fucked around, and always will be... people on the internet apparently just havent been a part of it...