Kerastem: Has A Uk Website Now And, Also Some New Pics.

cocona

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
338
Not sure how new this is but kerastem now has a uk site with additional pics.

Uk kerastem site:
https://www.kerastem.co.uk/



Kerastem+B%26A+17.png

Kerastem+B%26A+16.png


Kerastem+B%26A+15.png


?format=1000w.png


Kerastem+B%26A+13.png


Kerastem+B%26A+12.png


Kerastem+B%26A+11.png


Kerastem+B%26A+10.png


?format=1000w.png


Kerastem+B%26A+8.png


Kerastem+B%26A+7.png


Kerastem+B%26A+6.png


Kerastem+B%26A+5.png


Kerastem+B%26A+1.png


Kerastem+B%26A+4.png
 
Last edited:

Giiizmo

Established Member
Reaction score
148
Looks like the lighting is systematically less bright in the "12 month" picture compared to the starting picture. That they at least tried to replicate the same conditions for each picture in regards to head position is a welcome sight however.

I also remember some people on this forum trying the treatment and being sorely disappointed.

I'd like to believe in Kerastem but it'll take more than a few nice pictures.
 

Seuxin

Experienced Member
Reaction score
356
Yeah, Kerastem is expansive and people who tried it doesn't get good results !
 

Pelopeleon

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
198
Looks like the lighting is systematically less bright in the "12 month" picture compared to the starting picture. That they at least tried to replicate the same conditions for each picture in regards to head position is a welcome sight however.

I also remember some people on this forum trying the treatment and being sorely disappointed.

I'd like to believe in Kerastem but it'll take more than a few nice pictures.

Even in those cases where they darkened the images, there is not a big improvement.
 

sadila

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
321
Are those pictures to promote the treatment or the camera flash ? Cause hell no i ain't buying that camera for low lighting the flash got weaker at 12 months that's all i'm spoting
 

Hairismylife

Established Member
Reaction score
77
The last three sets of pics have less lighting difference. If all these pics are not artificially made-up or the patients are using concealer, then it's fair to say there are some improvement.
 

kiwi666

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
892
If this was 100% legit everyone here wouldn’t be asking.

If not one person can claim it’s worked it’s gotta be lies. And by person I mean senior or experienced trusted member of this community.

I don’t trust first time posters signing any praises. And nor should you :p
 

charlie76761

Established Member
Reaction score
121
Anybody on here actually tried this?


I did. Didn't work one bit.

Any organizations that has to try and use dim light tricks to support their product, obviously doesn't have a product that works.

I'm guessing they've just put this up as want to raise some investor cash.

Nobody has has had decent results. The science about it sucks - that fat placed in your scalp is cleared out by the body in days... I had bulges that I could feel which disappear v soon after.
 

charlie76761

Established Member
Reaction score
121
2nd row of pics is the best - her hair is light brown on the left hand side with flash, but black on the rhs without flash. Hilarious

This industry in 2018... Cant even come up with better results faking, let alone the answer to hair loss! :)
 

buckthorn

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
5,209

WOW!! The before and after pics of men with NO hair loss in varying lighting conditions is as impressive as all the women!! I mean, when I saw that teenager with a cowlick under super bright lighting and then AGAIN with a cowlick in a DUNGEON, I thought this is the treatment for me!!
 

Blackber

Experienced Member
Reaction score
604
These pictures are such BS. Don't even look at the hair look at the background in several of the pictures, you can blatantly see they messed around with the brightness - nevermind the wet hair before pictures vs the dry hair after pictures.

I'm one of the members that got this treatment done and it did nothing. The obvious snake oil companies are bad enough but the fact that some of these companies, like Kerastem, that claim to be professional do this is offensive. Truly preying on the weak to make a buck.
 

cocona

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
338
I’m too jaded and too exasperated at this point to believe this sh*t. Pics taken my real users with the same lighting or f*** right off m8. Back to my hole of cycism and hatred.

Yeah it's pretty rough. I'm sorry sweetheart. :(
 

Georgie

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,721
Yeah it's pretty rough. I'm sorry sweetheart. :(
I just wish big companies wouldn’t take advantage of desperate, suffering humans, and we are ALL suffering here. Makes my stomach turn thinking about how there are men and women feeling legitimately suicidal because of this disease, and there’s scum out there who see dollar signs radiating off of our f*****g sadness.
 

Jonnyyy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
823
I just wish big companies wouldn’t take advantage of desperate, suffering humans, and we are ALL suffering here. Makes my stomach turn thinking about how there are men and women feeling legitimately suicidal because of this disease, and there’s scum out there who see dollar signs radiating off of our f*****g sadness.
Unfortunately it's always been like that and it'll never change :(
 

cocona

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
338
Any organization that leads with photos and doesn't provide hair counts is a scam, period.


I'm the one who posted the photos not kerastem.

Hair counts are on the link right before the pics:

What can I expect?

Kerastem Hair Therapy is an excellent treatment for early stage hair loss. Our clinical data shows that not only does Kerastem Hair Therapy halt hair loss but on average patients can expect an increase of 31 hairs per square cm after 6 months. This represents an increase of up to 53% in the number of hairs.

Below you can see some representative examples.

This is pretty much what you can expect as far as data from kerastem goes. 29-31 hairs/cm^2 That's basically what they report in all their studies. Feel free to believe whatever though. Lots of people hate them. I just though the irony of your statement was a bit humorous.

It isn't a technology to believe in if you are male anyways unless you're on dutasteride or a strong antiandrogen or the like. It just wont get past the scalp degeneration.
 

Georgie

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,721
I'm the one who posted the photos not kerastem.

Hair counts are on the link right before the pics:



This is pretty much what you can expect as far as data from kerastem goes. 29-31 hairs/cm^2 That's basically what they report in all their studies. Feel free to believe whatever though. Lots of people hate them. I just though the irony of your statement was a bit humorous.

It isn't a technology to believe in if you are male anyways unless you're on dutasteride or a strong antiandrogen or the like. It just wont get past the scalp degeneration.
That’s a decent hair count. If there were more anecdotal, personal accounts backing its efficacy on the forums, I’d be inclined to
Give it a shot, but I’m so suspicious after literally everything has left us high and dry over the years. That and there’s no kerastem clinic in Australia.. although I believe they are planning to establish one in Melbourne. Anyway, more proof from sources outside the company and I’m almost ready to try. Do we know how much it is? Seem like a fairly invasive procedure. Probably costs more than I’m worth.
 

cocona

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
338
That’s a decent hair count. If there were more anecdotal, personal accounts backing its efficacy on the forums, I’d be inclined to
Give it a shot, but I’m so suspicious after literally everything has left us high and dry over the years. That and there’s no kerastem clinic in Australia.. although I believe they are planning to establish one in Melbourne. Anyway, more proof from sources outside the company and I’m almost ready to try. Do we know how much it is? Seem like a fairly invasive procedure. Probably costs more than I’m worth.

Google says around 6k. It'd be nice if they could bring the price point down to around 1500...

It's about as invasive as a liposuction
 
Top