Hi everyone, ill skip the boring intro about my personal experience. What i will say is that after 8 years of waiting for something better then finasteride, its become evident that the research is being conducted wrong.
The reason for this i believe is crystal clear to most in that - Everyone is stabbing in the dark.
There is no way that by experimenting with different compounds that we will happen to come up with something that somehow stops hairloss and promotes hair growth I just dont think its possible to work that way which is clear
from the amount of time and money that has gone into trying to find a solution and expecting luck and random findings to occur. What i think we should do is simplify the whole process and look much more at a large collective of people who have male pattern baldness VS those who dont, and we need to look at every single detail in ones blood and serum including hormones and compounds and see if there is any difference between the groups, in my opinion we just dont no this difference well enough and as everyone knows dht alone is not the problem.
What i am suggesting is that we all do a large blood panel and as detailed as possible looking at all the various markers and compare this to a group of people who do not have male pattern baldness, Im convinced something
will stand out which separates the two, whether that be a larger amount, smaller amount or just different ratios of certain compounds/ hormones that the few theorys which are out there already. Imagine if it was some just a difference that had gone unnoticed due to lack of observation and there is already a chemical that inhibits or stimulates it out there, it could really be that easy if we haven't looked enough, even if its not a cure but a side effect free inhibitor. I think its worth a shot guys.
Of course what I am proposing would be perfect to do as a sanctioned test all under one approved laboratory and although the cost would be really low compared to whats already being thrown about in this field i dont think we personally could get the funds for this but obviously there would be a huge return for a company that did if something was found. If we couldnt do it our self then maybe start some sort of poll or write something up to send to a researching company
I know most people will probably bring up a load of hate on this but forward thinking is the only way we will realistically solve the problem, so one must try.
So what do you all say?
The reason for this i believe is crystal clear to most in that - Everyone is stabbing in the dark.
There is no way that by experimenting with different compounds that we will happen to come up with something that somehow stops hairloss and promotes hair growth I just dont think its possible to work that way which is clear
from the amount of time and money that has gone into trying to find a solution and expecting luck and random findings to occur. What i think we should do is simplify the whole process and look much more at a large collective of people who have male pattern baldness VS those who dont, and we need to look at every single detail in ones blood and serum including hormones and compounds and see if there is any difference between the groups, in my opinion we just dont no this difference well enough and as everyone knows dht alone is not the problem.
What i am suggesting is that we all do a large blood panel and as detailed as possible looking at all the various markers and compare this to a group of people who do not have male pattern baldness, Im convinced something
will stand out which separates the two, whether that be a larger amount, smaller amount or just different ratios of certain compounds/ hormones that the few theorys which are out there already. Imagine if it was some just a difference that had gone unnoticed due to lack of observation and there is already a chemical that inhibits or stimulates it out there, it could really be that easy if we haven't looked enough, even if its not a cure but a side effect free inhibitor. I think its worth a shot guys.
Of course what I am proposing would be perfect to do as a sanctioned test all under one approved laboratory and although the cost would be really low compared to whats already being thrown about in this field i dont think we personally could get the funds for this but obviously there would be a huge return for a company that did if something was found. If we couldnt do it our self then maybe start some sort of poll or write something up to send to a researching company
I know most people will probably bring up a load of hate on this but forward thinking is the only way we will realistically solve the problem, so one must try.
So what do you all say?
