person_123
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 0
here's my hypothetical:
you pay 10k for HM. it looks GREAT! totally natural head of hair, best case scenario, you have the head of hair you had when you were a young man, (boy if you lost hair when you were young). maybe even thicker.
dht is still in the scalp. wont you lose the hair you got from hm? ok.... say you don't, say the hair is stronger, it adapts to dht, or is immune to dht because it is young. or whatever, say they found a way to block dht forever with the microinjections (which they may well have, because they know that dht causes hair loss, so they wouldn't develop a cure that doesn't last, because we already have those).
what about the hairs that we already have. the hairs that may thin in the future? wouldn't we just have to do hm all over again? does this mean that it's best to be "really" thin before starting hm? or can they implant hairs everywhere anyway?
just a worry i have about it, but it's still the best cure to look forward to in any forseeable future.
you pay 10k for HM. it looks GREAT! totally natural head of hair, best case scenario, you have the head of hair you had when you were a young man, (boy if you lost hair when you were young). maybe even thicker.
dht is still in the scalp. wont you lose the hair you got from hm? ok.... say you don't, say the hair is stronger, it adapts to dht, or is immune to dht because it is young. or whatever, say they found a way to block dht forever with the microinjections (which they may well have, because they know that dht causes hair loss, so they wouldn't develop a cure that doesn't last, because we already have those).
what about the hairs that we already have. the hairs that may thin in the future? wouldn't we just have to do hm all over again? does this mean that it's best to be "really" thin before starting hm? or can they implant hairs everywhere anyway?
just a worry i have about it, but it's still the best cure to look forward to in any forseeable future.