https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...2-inhibits-wnt-signalling-hair-growth.118792/ same thread already exists.
Credit: Wikipedia
Credit: Wikipedia
Sorry that was the point where i stoped reading
Hmm isn’t this concept similar to microneedling wounding?https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07142-9
Here’s the real source. nature, the most prestigious journal in the world.
Meh.. only done on mice though.. I like the direction this is going though...
I think they are saying in normal wounded skin there is an issue, but the sonic pathway pushed through it...So if I'm reading this correctly, we can now rule out the proliferation of perifollicular fibrosis as a rate limiting factor on
AGΑ recovery.
I think they are saying in normal wounded skin there is an issue, but the sonic pathway pushed through it...
Unless I missed something, I don't think we can dismiss perrifuclar fibrosis
Ito says scientists have until now assumed that, as part of the healing process, scarring and collagen buildup in damaged skin were behind its inability to regrow hair "Now we know that it's a signaling issue in cells that are very active as we develop in the womb, but less so in mature skin cells as we age," she adds.
It never states directly fibrosis. It could be fixing the fibrosisThis conclusion is rejecting fibrosis as a rate limiting factor of hair growth no?
Scarring and collagen build up is fibrosis if I'm not mistakenIt never states directly fibrosis. It could be fixing the fibrosis
Research on the SHH pathway goes back like 20 years. There's short summary from Hairlosscure2020
https://www.hairlosscure2020.com/the-sonic-hedgehog-pathway-an-unrealized-dream/
It was so promising a company called Curis was step up in 2000 to commercialise a treatment that then partnered with Procter & Gamble in 2005. But the whole thing was scrapped in 2007 because of the potential risk of cancer. This study seems to be saying they may have found a way round this.
You are right. But we do not know from that study if it removed the fibrosis or not; it "changed" the wounded tissue.Scarring and collagen build up is fibrosis if I'm not mistaken
You are right. But we do not know from that study if it removed the fibrosis or not; it "changed" the wounded tissue.
The fact it completes wound healing sounds like ptd dbm