I
Plus, if they did work the side effects people suffer from would surely be the same because their proposed function is the same as the likes of finasteride, where it blocks the formation of DHT?
Drugs often take influence from nature but they are manufactured to be more potent versions of the active ingredient.
I don't doubt that they have some effect, but it's too minor to make a different.
We all want more information on what 5 ar 2 does exactly but in those years what are you going to do exactly? I mean let your hair loss get worse knowing it can not be reversed or to roll the dice and maybe keep your hair with no problems until we have a safer better treatment such as CB 03 01?
Saw palmetto made my prostate feel amazing way before I even touched finasteride. SP with finasteride makes my prostate feel like there is a euphoria coming from there. Even if I didn't have hair loss, I'd just take both just because of how good it makes my prostate feel. However, I think saw palmetto caused me to shed especially when I used the topical version. I've been told that shedding is a good sign? I jumped on finasteride because the lack of scientific evidence and increased hair shed freaked me out too much.
Remarkably, in another biochemical study, it was found that LSESr was a 3-fold more effective inhibitor than finasteride (5 mg/day) at
concentrations adjusted to the recommended doses for BPH treatment. It should be noted that finasteride as indicated for Androgenetic Alopecia
is dosed significantly lower (1 mg/day), suggesting, a 15-fold more potent level of inhibition at the recommended daily dose of
LSESr (320 mg/day) (Delos et al. 1994).
I might give it a go, along with nettle and pigeum.I was looking at this pdf and wondering why doesn't more people use Saw plametto?
http://www.usrf.org/research/best_poster.pdf
Finasteride reduced DHT from 5.01ng/g to 1.05ng/g
Saw Palmetto reduced DHT from 6.49ng/g to 4.40ng/g
I would say Saw Palmetto decrease is more healthy, plus unlike finasteride, it didn't reduced DHT serum, which in my book is a good thing. So if it was able to reduce DHT on the prostate without reducing serum DHT, the only explanation possible, it's because it blocked the binding of the DHT. It isn't this the thing that everyone wants and is looking for? Something that doesn't inhibit DHT production but only the binding?
Unfortunally i can't seem to find the dosage used.