- Reaction score
- 105
http://www.folliclethought.com/
Over the next 18 months
Over the next 18 months
The First Treatment For Injectable Baldness Is Expected In 2020
- Thread starter bekeero
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 1,027
You first inject baldness , then inject finasteride .
Anyway, all I see from them is pain , regular results and expensive treatment .
- Reaction score
- 986
It’s a joke or I missed something???
- Reaction score
- 359
FFS is that meant to be an improvement. You can be pretty sure its a sh*t treatment if they are using old guys that have a probable snails pace of hairloss anyway.
- Reaction score
- 892
All we read from you is pain and regular negativity.
- Reaction score
- 892
That’s a lot of hair grown back under his birthmark.
And you do realise they test these drugs on all different types of people including age.
And don’t you think it’s a bit dumb to presume how long he’s been bald. For all any of us know he could have been bald there for 20 years!
Attachments
- Reaction score
- 2,565
This is a picture from Rivertown Therapeutics.We are talking about Replicel. Aren't we, are we...? The thread is confusing.
So all we are talking about is new data, not even a conditional product launch. That is hardly good news, or if I give you the benefit of doubt, am I missing something?
Those pics are actually great, someone that old with that much improvement in 4 months is amazing tbh.
The thing that people are missing is that there is only one new component in this. It's made of Csa + minoxidil + rt175. Third one its the thing they are testing for safety as both the previous 2 are fda aproved.
Problem with this is that for what we may now this regrowth may all be thanks to the usual minoxidil which is in there. Csa is also known to work as it has been written here many times, but side effects may be terrible inlcuding a very low chance of causing cance iirc. I mean people here complain about finasteride all the time and this could be potentially much worse in the sides department.
The thing that people are missing is that there is only one new component in this. It's made of Csa + minoxidil + rt175. Third one its the thing they are testing for safety as both the previous 2 are fda aproved.
Problem with this is that for what we may now this regrowth may all be thanks to the usual minoxidil which is in there. Csa is also known to work as it has been written here many times, but side effects may be terrible inlcuding a very low chance of causing cance iirc. I mean people here complain about finasteride all the time and this could be potentially much worse in the sides department.
- Reaction score
- 359
So if your happy with growing a few strands of hair, good for you. Why don't we see younger guys with results then, its easy to put out some old dude and if he grows a strand, people say wow he has hairloss for twenty years and he regrew, imagine what it could do for me a young guy. Its all a marketing ploy. When I see guy in late 20s with receding hairlne pattern that regrows his temples, then I will know we have legit treatment.
- Reaction score
- 1,027
Lol, go for another scam, isn't Brotzu not enough ?
- Reaction score
- 1,027
Really ? first at all, that is not an agressive hair loss, cause "someone that old " with an agressive one, at that age, should be a norwood 7 .
Just look for old Rogain clinical trial photos for much, much, better results. and pain free.
Why anybody will spend real money, if people buy this kind of scam ?
- Reaction score
- 223
That’s amazing regrowth imo. Especially for someone that age.
- Reaction score
- 986
That's what a lot of guys said for Brotzu ...
Just 2 examples
I hope I'm wrong, because I really need something new, and obviously I'm not the only one here.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 64
Have you ever heard the story "The emperor's new clothes"?
- Reaction score
- 892
Have you heard about the guy on the forums who didn’t do anything and just lost all his hair?
- Reaction score
- 4,609
I would go even further, have you heard duke nukem saying « you’re face, you’re ***, whats the difference? »