Tm30089 And Oc000459 Where Is All The Information??

[Ljames]

Hi Guys,

I've been looking into TM30089 and OC000459, but I am looking through the forum and can't find any information. Which strikes me as strange as from what I can tell there is normally a half dozen threads for each question.

I was just hoping to find some answers to see if one of these (leaning towards TM30089) would be a good inclusion to my routine.

I would be quite keen if anyone has has success, the dosage that would be best to use, the vehicle best suited for these and the potential sides?

I have thought about dumping in with RU but the sleep sides have put me off that idea so would be looking at using it in the morning.

Thanks for any help in advance

 

[Screeech]

Hi Guys,

I've been looking into TM30089 and OC000459, but I am looking through the forum and can't find any information. Which strikes me as strange as from what I can tell there is normally a half dozen threads for each question.

I was just hoping to find some answers to see if one of these (leaning towards TM30089) would be a good inclusion to my routine.

I would be quite keen if anyone has has success, the dosage that would be best to use, the vehicle best suited for these and the potential sides?

I have thought about dumping in with RU but the sleep sides have put me off that idea so would be looking at using it in the morning.

Thanks for any help in advance

Also considering TM.

Use the search function and type in "TM30089" as well as "30089" and there's posts on it in several different threads unrelated to it specifically, as well as a few small threads dedicated to it.

Problem is that you have to enter a certain amount of characters when using the search function and "TM" is not enough, so all the posts where people just used 'TM' when referring to it are pretty much lost, which is probably most of them 'cause it's easier to type.

Same thing with CB.

 

[yayapapaya]

Seti overtook them as a more effective/safer alternative.

 

[Ljames]

Seti overtook them as a more effective/safer alternative.

Am I right in saying that it's also a LOT more expensive? I've seen a 2g a day figure thrown around which seems way beyond reasonable what it costs £75 for 5g.

Or have I completely got lost on this one?

 

[Alex Contee]

Am I right in saying that it's also a LOT more expensive? I've seen a 2g a day figure thrown around which seems way beyond reasonable what it costs £75 for 5g.

Or have I completely got lost on this one?

Your lost. People were taking 2G of Seti orally. You would use much less of that topically. To my knowledge, no one was taking the drugs you mentioned orally. I doubt anyone on this site still uses the drugs you mentioned. I use OC but rely on forum info, mostly from BTT, from years ago.

 

[yayapapaya]

Am I right in saying that it's also a LOT more expensive? I've seen a 2g a day figure thrown around which seems way beyond reasonable what it costs £75 for 5g.

Or have I completely got lost on this one?

2g is for oral use like someone mentioned above. I use ~100mg daily topically.