Matgallis
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 0
I was running some ideas through my head today about the ability of a topical to be carried to the follicle so work can be done.
I than began thinking about scar tissue and how it is indeed thicker, tougher and harded to get through. Is it possible that shampoos and other topical carriers can't penetrate this scar tissue well? This could be the reason why tropicals just don't work very well, the tropicals can't get through to the already damaged follicle.
Which lead me to an idea, why don't we use a vehicle that expands the vessels in our scalps, like nitric oxide before putting on our topicals? That way the topical enters the blood stream (outside the source of the problem) easier and is directly connected to the area in need from the source where the DHT already is? Would this make sense? it seems like a good way to bypass the scar tissue surrounding the follicle.
I was considering putting a small amount of No into a shampoo before using my nizoral/GTE combo and then shortly after add my revivogen and spironolactone topicals.
/crazy
I than began thinking about scar tissue and how it is indeed thicker, tougher and harded to get through. Is it possible that shampoos and other topical carriers can't penetrate this scar tissue well? This could be the reason why tropicals just don't work very well, the tropicals can't get through to the already damaged follicle.
Which lead me to an idea, why don't we use a vehicle that expands the vessels in our scalps, like nitric oxide before putting on our topicals? That way the topical enters the blood stream (outside the source of the problem) easier and is directly connected to the area in need from the source where the DHT already is? Would this make sense? it seems like a good way to bypass the scar tissue surrounding the follicle.
I was considering putting a small amount of No into a shampoo before using my nizoral/GTE combo and then shortly after add my revivogen and spironolactone topicals.
/crazy