gascoigne
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 3
Hello everybody, hello Saf, Ucman, Ori, Lossitall, seb, Primo and other guys i talk with here.
I know most of boys here dont like me and consider me delusional, strange or maybe crazy, but it is important to give attention to text and arguments in it. In this post i am not saying what is GOOD, what is BAD, or what it should(not) be. I am just (trying) to sum up some facts.
LOOKS ARE IMPORTANT, VERY MUCH IMPORTANT. Both for men and women, there is nothing to be shame of for not beeing higly emotional, emphatic, spiritual angels full of understanding and love for everybody, that is our NATURE.
Beeing bald is NO WIN situation as MOST of women really dont like bald men.
Thats couse bald men CANT, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, look great! The best some lucky of us can is to look OK. Its nature, is simple: guy with hair and 5-6/10 face attributes IS LOT MORE ATTRACTIVE then 8-9/10 face att. bald guy. Due this significant handicap, bald men cant look GREAT or EXCELLENT.
That is imposible just by human nature. Hair IS part of face, its FRAME of face. Handsome man without hair is no longer handsome, he is *andsome
If you can catch my metaphor due the matter of lackness (lack hair - lack part of beauty - lack beginig of word).
Statham, Wilis, Diesel, etc etc etc - none of them look TRULY EXCELLENT. They look ok/good becouse they normal and proper face and head shapes, and becouse of their great bodies. Why they are sex symbols and whay they get lot hot women, thats totally different and aestethicaly irrelevant subject. (If they were just ordinary, anoniomus guys, all that media constructed attraction would vanish.)
It is not how i see it, its how GIRLS and LADIES see it. (TBH, in my opinion a guy with NW4-5 not buzzed of hair is non bald to me). Since all women are not the same, then i mean talking from position of 70-80% girls and ladies.
Further, 90% of ALL average and above average females (sorry for not inducting ugly and unattractive girls, bu we need to be honest, no one would want them if there is a choice) are SHALLOW and VAIN. In some degree.
Hot and not so inteligent young girls will stay equally shalow when she get in her 40is and 50is. Hot and inteligent girls will loss some of their vanity as they get older.
So, in terms of young (19-26) good and above looking girls, they DO find developed (or advanced) NW3 (majority of front and first half of top hair gone) BALD and unattractive. Sure, there are exepctions, but my 5 years expirience of talking, dating and having sex with many wmen (respectively) learned me so.
I am talking from a perspective of true, basic sexual appeal and attraction. When it comes to trying to make a serious, long term relationship (as people get older most of them are forced to lower expectations) then this statistic may not be correct and sure normal NW3 (or even 4) shouldnt have big troubles with finding nice and honest life partner.
Now, the numeric version:
Norwood 1-2(2.5) : Ok, with hair
[Norwood 3 (at fist phase and not buzzed off or shaved): ok, with (tolerable) hair]
Norwood 3 (developed phase with, buzzed or not, no or VERY high hairline and not much hair on top): Bald
[Norwood 2-early 3 (with visible, not even large spot on vertex/ no receeding hairline and no significant thining/ early phase of Zidane male pattern baldness): Bald
Norwood 4-7 (buzzed/shaved or not): Bald.
In other words, LADIES ARE MAKING THIS VERY HARD FOR US. THEY ARE SO SHALLOW AND VAIN, AND THAT IS JUST A TRUTH. I wish i could change that.
I know most of boys here dont like me and consider me delusional, strange or maybe crazy, but it is important to give attention to text and arguments in it. In this post i am not saying what is GOOD, what is BAD, or what it should(not) be. I am just (trying) to sum up some facts.
LOOKS ARE IMPORTANT, VERY MUCH IMPORTANT. Both for men and women, there is nothing to be shame of for not beeing higly emotional, emphatic, spiritual angels full of understanding and love for everybody, that is our NATURE.
Beeing bald is NO WIN situation as MOST of women really dont like bald men.
Thats couse bald men CANT, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, look great! The best some lucky of us can is to look OK. Its nature, is simple: guy with hair and 5-6/10 face attributes IS LOT MORE ATTRACTIVE then 8-9/10 face att. bald guy. Due this significant handicap, bald men cant look GREAT or EXCELLENT.
That is imposible just by human nature. Hair IS part of face, its FRAME of face. Handsome man without hair is no longer handsome, he is *andsome
If you can catch my metaphor due the matter of lackness (lack hair - lack part of beauty - lack beginig of word).
Statham, Wilis, Diesel, etc etc etc - none of them look TRULY EXCELLENT. They look ok/good becouse they normal and proper face and head shapes, and becouse of their great bodies. Why they are sex symbols and whay they get lot hot women, thats totally different and aestethicaly irrelevant subject. (If they were just ordinary, anoniomus guys, all that media constructed attraction would vanish.)
It is not how i see it, its how GIRLS and LADIES see it. (TBH, in my opinion a guy with NW4-5 not buzzed of hair is non bald to me). Since all women are not the same, then i mean talking from position of 70-80% girls and ladies.
Further, 90% of ALL average and above average females (sorry for not inducting ugly and unattractive girls, bu we need to be honest, no one would want them if there is a choice) are SHALLOW and VAIN. In some degree.
Hot and not so inteligent young girls will stay equally shalow when she get in her 40is and 50is. Hot and inteligent girls will loss some of their vanity as they get older.
So, in terms of young (19-26) good and above looking girls, they DO find developed (or advanced) NW3 (majority of front and first half of top hair gone) BALD and unattractive. Sure, there are exepctions, but my 5 years expirience of talking, dating and having sex with many wmen (respectively) learned me so.
I am talking from a perspective of true, basic sexual appeal and attraction. When it comes to trying to make a serious, long term relationship (as people get older most of them are forced to lower expectations) then this statistic may not be correct and sure normal NW3 (or even 4) shouldnt have big troubles with finding nice and honest life partner.
Now, the numeric version:
Norwood 1-2(2.5) : Ok, with hair
[Norwood 3 (at fist phase and not buzzed off or shaved): ok, with (tolerable) hair]
Norwood 3 (developed phase with, buzzed or not, no or VERY high hairline and not much hair on top): Bald
[Norwood 2-early 3 (with visible, not even large spot on vertex/ no receeding hairline and no significant thining/ early phase of Zidane male pattern baldness): Bald
Norwood 4-7 (buzzed/shaved or not): Bald.
In other words, LADIES ARE MAKING THIS VERY HARD FOR US. THEY ARE SO SHALLOW AND VAIN, AND THAT IS JUST A TRUTH. I wish i could change that.
