G
Guest
Guest
A couple days ago USA Today, worthless drivel that calls itself a newspaper and my place of employment happens to subscribe to, did an article on all these famous sports figures and their elaborate hair styles. The jist of the article was that men in sports no longer simply buzz their heads or keep it short, but do all sorts of outlandish things with it. One of the article's salient messages was that hair can really define and distinguish a man.
And I'm losing mine in my early 20's!! AAAAA!! I, too, seek distinction. I, too, desire definition. I, too, am consumed by a vanity to be "attractive", despite my lack of presence in the world of collegiate and professional sports. Man, talk about insensitive.
USA Today totally dissed my ***. And I can't even throw a football 100 yards.
Who will right this wrong? What a stupid f-ing newspaper. What a stupid f-ing gene. I'm not sure what purpose male pattern balding serves, but it's sure as sh*t succeeding. I guess that's the definition of genetic success: continued existence within the gene pool. Lame.
And I'm losing mine in my early 20's!! AAAAA!! I, too, seek distinction. I, too, desire definition. I, too, am consumed by a vanity to be "attractive", despite my lack of presence in the world of collegiate and professional sports. Man, talk about insensitive.
USA Today totally dissed my ***. And I can't even throw a football 100 yards.
Who will right this wrong? What a stupid f-ing newspaper. What a stupid f-ing gene. I'm not sure what purpose male pattern balding serves, but it's sure as sh*t succeeding. I guess that's the definition of genetic success: continued existence within the gene pool. Lame.