Gadgetine

Usc Stem Cell Scientists Developing A New Cure-all For Baldness

c_super2

Established Member
Reaction score
66
In the lab, USC researchers created skin with hair follicles from stem cells, which they transplanted onto the shaved back of a host mouse. Within a short time, vigorous hair production was noted.

Dr. Cheng-Ming Chuong, professor of pathology at the Keck School of Medicine of USC, is the senior investigator of a study published by the Stem Cell Laboratory of the University of Southern California at Los Angeles. He and his team of researchers are discovering a means by which hair follicles can be grown from skin cells reproduced in vitro in the lab. The study was funded principally by the National Institutes of Health and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In it, researchers outline a step-by-step sequence of events in the production of hair follicles from skin. Specifically, they were able to generate hair by uncovering the major molecular events necessary for the growth of skin and fostering it in adult shaved mice.

"Many aging individuals do not grow hair well, because adult cells lose their regenerative ability. But with our new findings, we are able to make adult mouse cells produce hair again," says Dr. Chuong.

Researchers at the USC lab could not confirm exactly when human trials could begin but were optimistic their findings could inspire a method for treating humans with alopecia and baldness in the near future by using some of the patient's own stem cells to grow skin with hair follicles in a lab, then transplanting it onto balding areas of the scalp.

The science behind the study
Stem cells, by definition, are undifferentiated cells that can be transformed into specialized cells to produce more of their kind. In adults they are used to maintain the normal turnover of regenerative organs, such as blood, bone marrow and skin. Based on findings by scientists at the University of Toronto in the 1960s, stem cell research has increased greatly over the last 50 years.

According to Dr. Mingxing Lei, the first author of the USC study, he and his international team of scientists used progenitor cells, a cell type more differentiated from stem cells. They transplanted the cells into shaved mice and from there witnessed how the cells behaved and recording the hair development that followed.

"Many aging individuals do not grow hair well, because adult cells lose their regenerative ability. But with our new findings, we are able to make adult mouse cells produce hair again." -Dr. Cheng-Ming Chuong, professor of pathology at the Keck School of Medicine
The team noted that these cells formed skinlike "organoids," 3-D assemblies of cells that gathered themselves into an organlike structure, which in this case was the ability to grow hair. Further, they took hundreds of time-lapse movies to analyze the collective cell behavior.

Next, they observed how the cells combined themselves into polarized cysts, which then coalesced to form layered skin. From it they created skin with hair follicles that were transplanted onto the back of a host mouse. Finally, they observed as the follicles vigorously produced hair. "We used a combination of bioinformatics and molecular screenings" to facilitate their analyses, Dr. Lei explained.

Concurrent with the research being done at USC, a variety of studies into the regeneration of human hair is under way. One is at the Yale University School of Medicine under the guidance of Dr. Valerie Horsley, associate professor of molecular, cellular and developmental biology, who expressed continuing interest in the research being done by Drs. Chuong and Lei. She is, she says, "excited by the work" being done at USC and looks forward to further results.

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/13/usc-stem-cell-scientists-developing-a-new-cure-all-for-baldness.html
 

hellouser

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,634
You know, I keep seeing these discoveries but something HAS TO CHANGE seeing how movement from mouse studies to human trials (even single case studies) take years or decades. That's NOT ACCEPTABLE progress.
 

rupture

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
93
I will gladly sign a waivier and be the "mouse" for one of these studies as long as they finish the job
 

ALightInTheDark

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
321
f*** rats or shits,do it directly on Monkeys,since we've a lot of similiarities.
Then do it on us,don't take 15 to 20 fuckin years to make your sh*t out.
God I hate how FDA or European Agencies are made.
 

sadila

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
321
f*** rats or shits,do it directly on Monkeys,since we've a lot of similiarities.
Then do it on us,don't take 15 to 20 fuckin years to make your sh*t out.
God I hate how FDA or European Agencies are made.
The only thing i like about trump is his opinion about the FDA i hope he does something soon
 

abcdefg

Senior Member
Reaction score
782
Okay well there are THOUSANDS of men willing to be experimented on for this. Start growing hair on a bald guys head, and then you will have something if that works.
A lot of this stuff is interconnected its not just hair we are learning more about. At least these guys are doing real science and figuring out something valuable verses the tons of junk studies everyday on the stupidest things imaginable.
 

InBeforeTheCure

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
950
I know that part is frustrating, but damn it looks like the scientists have advanced a lot. This study also proves that progenitor cells grow hair. Bald men are missing progenitor cells too.

Bald men are missing Lgr5+ hair follicle progenitor cells. The green stain here (from Jaks et al.) shows Lgr5 expression in hair follicles in telogen (left) and in anagen (right):

jaks1.png


If you transplant these Lgr5+ cells into the skin, they'll form new hair follicles (top left, also from Jaks et al.):

jaks2.png


The USC study, on the other hand, used K14+ (Keratin 14+) epidermal progenitor cells. K14 is expressed throughout the basal layer of the epidermis, including hair follicles, at least in adult skin (K14 stain in green in top row, from Collins, Kretzschmar, and Watt):

collins1.png


The progenitor cells this latest study used were K14+, most of which would probably come from the interfollicular epidermis (the skin between the hair follicles). When they took the cells from newborn mice, they made hair-bearing skin. When they took the cells from adult mice, they got skin but no hair follicles. The trick was to get the adult cells to form hair-bearing skin, which they were able to do by mimicking some of the signals present in newborn skin but not adult skin.
 

Trichosan

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,327
The only thing i like about trump is his opinion about the FDA i hope he does something soon

Unfortunately, there are more rats in these unelected bureaucrat organizations then there are mice in hair research labs. And they become more bloated as we become more bald.
 

Jonnyyy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
823
There's has to be a change in the way research is done, if a person wants to be the guinea pig and is ok with all the potential side effects let them sign a waiver and pay them. It's that simple it would take a few years to find a good treatment if we did it this way. Something had to be done about this.
 

Trichosan

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,327
There's has to be a change in the way research is done, if a person wants to be the guinea pig and is ok with all the potential side effects let them sign a waiver and pay them. It's that simple it would take a few years to find a good treatment if we did it this way. Something had to be done about this.

Because of the legal environment in the US, that scenario will never happen. Outside the US would be the only way depending on whose legal system it is.
 

Trouse

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
365
Because of the legal environment in the US, that scenario will never happen. Outside the US would be the only way depending on whose legal system it is.

I understand this is the truth, yet still have trouble coming to terms with it because it's bullshit. You sign your life away when you go skydiving for instance. There's an infinitesimally small chance you become paint on the ground if both chutes fail and yet plenty of people still choose to do it. And there's not even a waiver required to smoke cigarettes or drink booze and those claim tens of thousands of lives annually a piece. I mean it's good we live in a country that has checks and balances for emerging drugs but it's gone way too far in the other direction. Computing technology is increasing exponentially and medical advancements are lagging behind because of all the red tape. They give experimental drugs to people like cancer patients and often times they're life-saving. It's true that people in medicine and government really don't care about comparatively minor issues like hair loss.
 
Top