V-shaped hairlines

G

Guest

Guest
I'm talking about V-shaped hairlines that make a V facing towards the hair. I have one. Who else does on here? I've seen them on people with no recession or hair loss and I tried to look the term up on google, and apparently it's the definition of a widow's peak. But i don't have a widow's peak and neither do some of the other people that I saw with v-shaped hairlines.

Some other kids I've seen have the straight boxy hairline, and some guys have the top half of a semicircle kinda hairline that girls seem to have a lot.

Here's my hairline for example. I don't think I am worse off than an NW2(you may disagree) but I still have that V-shape. Who else here has that?

jaynwfj6.jpg


jaynw2mp8.jpg
 

dietcola

Experienced Member
Reaction score
6
i have that! well i did 4 years ago

i would have unprotected sex with roadkill for that hairline
 
G

Guest

Guest
dietcola said:
i have that! well i did 4 years ago

i would have unprotected sex with roadkill for that hairline

i'd trade my hairline for yours if i could have your ex. SCHWING. would you trade your ex for it? surely that's better than unprotected sex with roadkill.

anyway if you are an nw2.5 as i said that maybe im only an nw1.5. probably not an nw1. maybe a nw2. who knows.
 

s.a.f

Senior Member
Reaction score
67
The hairline shape is just another genetic trait, people have different ones there is no right or wrong growth style and wether yours is straight curved or v shaped has no bearing on wether you will suffer from m.p.b.
 
G

Guest

Guest
s.a.f said:
The hairline shape is just another genetic trait, people have different ones there is no right or wrong growth style and wether yours is straight curved or v shaped has no bearing on wether you will suffer from m.p.b.

so what norwood do you think i am? i think its tougher to tell with v shaped ones like mine since the hairline is already curved.
 

s.a.f

Senior Member
Reaction score
67
Yours is better than Johnny Knoxvilles so 1.5 not yet a 2 (pretty good!)
 
G

Guest

Guest
s.a.f said:
Yours is better than Johnny Knoxvilles so 1.5 not yet a 2 (pretty good!)

thanks this is what i thought. can you explain why though? is it because the temples haven't really formed an island in front like in knoxville's, but have still receded a little bit on each side? like what would i look like with an nw1? the tops of the temples would still have hair?

if only i had gotten on the drugs 2 years ago instead of last year.
 

s.a.f

Senior Member
Reaction score
67
Dont worry about it your hair is great, nobody would think that you had any loss there are 15 yr olds with less hair than that.
 
G

Guest

Guest
s.a.f said:
Dont worry about it your hair is great, nobody would think that you had any loss there are 15 yr olds with less hair than that.

alas, i am diffuse for 3 inches behind the hairline, saf. if rogaine does not fill it in I WILL be looking into an hair transplant. the webcam pictures make my hair look much better than it actually is, anyway.

my hair looks like a war zone when it's wet and messed up. i'd trade my hair for knoxville's in a second. i have a better hairline but he is much, much thicker behind it.
 
G

Guest

Guest
here's a pic of me from september with my hair like i described, saf. it has improved a lot but here's what i was dealing with. it's still only about half fixed. dry it looks great, wet- NO lol. i'm gonna have to apply minoxidil to that whole fookin area.

 

s.a.f

Senior Member
Reaction score
67
Well diffuse loss is better than plain recession, as its only visible from close up.
 
G

Guest

Guest
s.a.f said:
Well diffuse loss is better than plain recession, as its only visible from close up.

and hopefully respond better to treatments lol. but we will see. there is a lot of work to be done=).
 
Top