DoctorHouse said:According to what I have read, NW3 is classified as balding. NW2 is more realistic of a mature hairline.
s.a.f said:Vince Vaughan is a good example he has a mature hairline (probably had it 15 yrs) And his hair will probably be almost the same in another 15 yrs. I'd certainly bet he wont be totally bald.
[attachment=0:36qeozwn]_42434415_vince_vaughan.jpg[/attachment:36qeozwn]
You dont, but in that situation the best way to predict would be by looking at your relatives.Oknow said:If you are a NW2 with a mature hairline, how do you know if it will escalate into a NW3. Seems all a bit hit and miss too me.
finfighter said:Vince vaugnh has hairloss, thats not the hairline of somebody who does not have a predisposition to DHT, he probably takes finasteride to maintain.
uncomfortable man said:I think receeders have more of a chance at hairloss naturaly haulting as oppossed to a diffuse thinner. I have never seen diffuse thinning just stop naturaly in it's tracks without winding up with the inevitable horseshoe. I was a bad diffuse thinner.
uncomfortable man said:I think receeders have more of a chance at hairloss naturaly haulting as oppossed to a diffuse thinner. I have never seen diffuse thinning just stop naturaly in it's tracks without winding up with the inevitable horseshoe. I was a bad diffuse thinner.
s.a.f said:[quote="uncomfortable man":1h5t9tx7]I think receeders have more of a chance at hairloss naturaly haulting as oppossed to a diffuse thinner. I have never seen diffuse thinning just stop naturaly in it's tracks without winding up with the inevitable horseshoe. I was a bad diffuse thinner.