bmoreno515
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 2
What is Acell and PRP therapy? Is that injections of cortisone?
Unbelievable that there are still people unable to use Google.Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is concentrated blood plasma which contains approximately three to five times the number of platelets found in normal circulating blood. In addition, it contains platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor (TGF) and other bioactive proteins that aid in wound healing and possibly hair growth.
If your rants were at least smart or informed... unfortunately, they are just rants.
There are two methodologically very well conducted studies that proved the effectiveness of PRP. Don't know about ACell though, but when correctly carried out (i.e. correct platelet concentration, timing, and activation protocol) PRP is proven to work.
Sorry, I didn't know you are also visually impaired. Life has hit you quite hard - baldness, choleric, and weak eyesight. My condolences.So, you believe these treatments work because.... evidence? There is no hard evidence of this working as well as they claim or as you or anyone else would hope. These docs, including you, are essentially pulling the wool over everyones eyes. Until there's solid evidence of before and after pics with SIGNIFICANT results
Sorry, I didn't know you are also visually impaired. Life has hit you quite hard - baldness, choleric, and weak eyesight. My condolences.
Get some glasses and check one example: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338465/
Or this one: http://grecomedicalgroup.com/eblast/10312014/2014_Schiavone-PRP.pdf
Or here: http://www.kosmed-klinik.de/fileadmin/Medienverwaltung/Dokumente/PRP-Haarausfall-englisch.pdf
I know that actual evidence will not make you change your mind. But hey, that's nothing new. You just want to continue ranting like the weak-minded person you are.
all of you keep masturbating over it.
There is a difference between studies performed for your own product and big studies carried out by independent hospitals with no affiliation to a commercial producer whatsoever.
But hey, hellouser knows it better, cause who needs a background in science or to distinguish between advertisement and clinical trials? It's all the same to hellouser, as long as it fits his point of view. Probably the biggest victim of the Dunning-Kruger effect on this planet.
Also, nobody ever claimed PRP was a big breakthrough. It's just a treatment that provides some regrowth and can halt your hairloss for approximately 1 year. Nothing more, nothing less. It's not a scam and it works in the limited effects I just mentioned. You don't like it what it offers? Then just don't get it. But f*cking inform yourself before spouting your hatred-filled nonsense again.
Wow, do even have, like, rational arguments? I guess that's too much to ask from you.
Otherwise you are free to point out why these independent studies, some even conducted by hospitals, are wrong.
These studies were conducted on patients as a regular treatment, as such the results are real-world results.
I know that the effect is, on average, quite limited. Some people however do get very good results on it. As I'm still rather young, i.e. my follicles aren't miniaturized for that long or partly not completely miniaturized, I decided to give it a try. Have my first injection session scheduled for beginning of May, and Doctor says results should be seen around 8 weeks later. I'll make a thread when the time comes so everyone can assess for themselves. I don't know if it'll be worth it or not, I'm just curious to try it out. If it has cosmetically significant effects, I'll get one every 12 months. If not, it will be my first and last PRP session.