persistentone
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 27
I found a table in a study, and the original study it references, that claim that RU58841 has only 5% of the affinity for the androgen receptor that DHT has. In other words, RU58841 would not be that effective in blocking DHT, if those numbers were true for hair follicle receptors.
Does anyone have data on how well RU58841 competes against testosterone for the same receptors? If DHT is 10 times more potent in binding against receptors than testosterone, that would imply that RU58841 and testosterone compete about equally well for receptor access? It would be good to have hard data, if a study exists.
If the above is even close to true, that might imply that the effectiveness of RU58841 is more tied to its ability to block testosterone than DHT.
Does anyone have data on how well RU58841 competes against testosterone for the same receptors? If DHT is 10 times more potent in binding against receptors than testosterone, that would imply that RU58841 and testosterone compete about equally well for receptor access? It would be good to have hard data, if a study exists.
If the above is even close to true, that might imply that the effectiveness of RU58841 is more tied to its ability to block testosterone than DHT.