Im diffuse thinner and I only worry about tsuji not being able to restore full density hair back.Give a percentage chance of how likely you think it is? eg 70% chance, 0% chance, whatever.
Kyocera and Tsuji are both going for full cures, do you think we'll have our hair back in 3 years?
They're all treatments, not cures. Only gene therapy could actually cure the disease.
I give Tsuji a 60% chance
Replicel a 25% chance
Histogen a 5% chance
Follica a 5% chance
Brotzu I give a 2% chance to be as effective as finasteride/minoxidil
Obviously these figures are plucke from my arse and mean nothing but my faith in them being effective for maintenance/regrowth.
Follica best staffed best funded more than Tsuji and Shiseido? How did you deduce that?You've got that upside down; Follica is by far the most legitimate, most researched, best staffed, and best funded of any of them. If there's any chance of something being available in three years, it's Follica.
Relax we are bound to have something that is atleast better than minoxidil+finasteride. Now for slick baldies we probably need full blown Tsuji treatmentThe only things we're going to see in the next 3 years are false hopes, disappointment and despair. At least they're cheap.
Its been in development for so many years. yet I still cant even find one picture with results. Even brotzu with his shitty camera has some pictures with results.Cotseralis is a pre-eminent researcher from one of the top five universities in the world, and PureTech's senior partners are all researchers from Harvard and MIT, another two of the best (if not the best) universities in the world. While PureTech's cap is smaller than the Japanese, their product pipeline is, too, so the per cap expenditure is probably higher.
Follica has a website and a Twitter account, and they have given basic descriptions of both their protocol and the devices. None of the repute companies are as far along as Follica - certainly not Tsui or Shiseido, and absolutely not Histogen. If Follica's protocol works (and given the noise they're making, they certainly think it does), it COULD be available in three years, which was the OP's question. I don't think it's likely, but I would if he had changed his timeline to four years.
wow, the only thread more depressing than "chad the thundercock is cumming inside of your girlfriend while she strokes his thick hair and laughs at a picture of you."
Cotseralis is a pre-eminent researcher from one of the top five universities in the world, and PureTech's senior partners are all researchers from Harvard and MIT, another two of the best (if not the best) universities in the world. While PureTech's cap is smaller than the Japanese, their product pipeline is, too, so the per cap expenditure is probably higher.
Follica has a website and a Twitter account, and they have given basic descriptions of both their protocol and the devices. None of the repute companies are as far along as Follica - certainly not Tsui or Shiseido, and absolutely not Histogen. If Follica's protocol works (and given the noise they're making, they certainly think it does), it COULD be available in three years, which was the OP's question. I don't think it's likely, but I would if he had changed his timeline to four years.
Great rebuttal!
Your message speaks for itself.
Poor man thinking Follica has the potential to become a cure (LOL). Mate, you are going to be in for a pleasant surprise.
Start loading up dat kirkland son and go get your sandpaper. Haha..
I mean histogen is supposed to come out at the end of 2017/start of 2018. That is basically a functional cure based off their data
Indeed, Follica has already done preclinical and clinical trials, says Olle, “all of which confirm that we can consistently create new hair follicles in mice and in humans. As far as I know, no other approach has been able to achieve that.”