philly said:
Thanks for replying Bryan.
Look at this group of graphs I have stolen from YOU
Heh. Yeah, I almost posted those same graphs, too, because they clearly show that daily "sawtooth" variation in inhibition with finasteride, and it's close to the same figure you originally quoted of 10%. But finally I decided that the older graph I posted was good enough for my modest purposes.
philly said:
Look at the graph C (solid line). The regeneration of 5AR2 is rapid! The daily variation of it is like 10%, just like the daily DHT variation (coincidence?). That's a lot I would presume.
Again, I don't know if I'd call it "a lot" or "rapid". Rapid, compared to WHAT, exactly? Glacier movement?

After all, as I've been saying for years on hairloss sites, it does take a week or two for DHT levels to get back to normal after the last dose of finasteride.
philly said:
Also look at the graph under the graph C on the left. DHT variation is indeed 10% (a little less) when fina is taken once a day.
Agreed.
philly said:
P.S. :
Merck did this experiment:
~90% 5AR2 inhibition (fina) -> x regrowth.
~90% 5AR2 inhibition (fina) + 100% 5AR1 inhibition -> x regrowth (SAME!).
What "experiment" are you talking about??
philly said:
Conclusion: 5AR1 has nothing to do with hair loss! Men without the 5AR2 are healthy and have small prostates and do not lose their hair. What we always forget to say is that they have the 5AR1 enzyme actively creating DHT! Those men have DHT!
I've never ever made the claim that 5AR1 has no effect at all on hairloss, just that it's not nearly as important as 5AR2. Anything that reduces even serum DHT (like a specific 5AR1 inhibitor) will have _some_ beneficial effect on hair, because a few of those serum DHT molecules will inevitably get into hair follicles.
philly said:
Then why is duta "better" that fina? Simply because it inhibits almost 100% of 5AR2.
I don't think that's the ONLY reason. Otherwise, it would be hard to explain why 2.5 mg/day of dutasteride does noticeably better than only 0.5 mg/day. It's hard to imagine that a virtually TOTAL suppression of 5AR2 (like you'd have with the larger dose) would be that much better than the 98%-99% suppression that you get with the standard dose. I think that the rest of the difference in hair results is indeed due to the (partial) inhibition of the type 1 enzyme.
philly said:
If duta only inhibited 5AR2, but not 5AR1, and if it had a shorter half-life, I would jump on the duta bandwagon right away!
If it had a shorter half-life, it wouldn't be as effective as it is at inhibiting EITHER of the 5a-reductase enzymes!
philly said:
Moreover, I would never even try dutasteride for the moment, not even 2 capsules a week. Duta inhibits roughly 50% of 5AR1. 5AR1 is in fact essential (I was told by my dermatologist), in the creation of healthy hair!
Go back to him and ask him to justify that claim!! Has he been reading Armando's posts?
philly said:
I read an article somewhere in French that stated that it intervenes in the hair production (protein production). I am not sure of this so if someone could find that article it would be great.
I've never heard such a claim. If you can find that article again, I'd REALLY like to read it!! :woot: