From my early research, this seems to be the correct answer, both have their merits. I think most young guys would be doing themselves a massive favor in the future if they opted for the strip first, because you'd be giving yourself an average of 3k more graft down the line if your loss pattern gets more aggressive or the results aren't to your liking.I just did my 2nd and final strip procedure and would vote for strip. I went to my first consultation asking for FUE, money isn’t a problem for me, but after the consultation I changed my mind and opted for strip. That was 2019. I just did another smaller strip procedure several weeks ago.
despite what the fue proponents are saying, a Dr will usually get better yield and graft quality with a stip. both have their disadvantages - strip you have a scar so you won’t be shaving the back of your head ever, FUE results in thinning of the donor area.
regardless of cost I would vote strip. Keep in mind the quality and ability of the dr and their staff will play a large role in the end result.
The reality is that the majority of people with early balding do not make good candidates for FUE surgery, despite what the marketing/surgeons would tell you. Under 8k graphs in a NW5/6+ is going to leave you with a very thin and sometimes unappealing thin look of your hair as you age, where as 10-12k would make a world of difference.
You see all the time on these forums or even in news articles. Guys get 5k graft procedures done covering the entire NW5 area and the end result is patchy and see-through. Then they have 3k grafts left and it isn't going to be enough to cover the entire top so they focus on the hairline and are left with a balding crown for the rest of their life and no tools left in the toolshed if they go from NW5 to NW6/7.