3 MONTH UPDATE

[Bone Daddy]

I think three month updates should be minimum, and I should replaced with a 12 month old AIM bot. Updates at the very minimum are wonderous.

I agree there, Red Rose!

 

[Cassin]

I think it is healthy for guys to post them whenever they want, 1 month to whenever. It helps them organize their thoughts and get things off their chest. Plus it makes them feel like they are more a part of the forum, which is what we want.

Though I wish more of you would use this area.

http://www.hairlosstalk.com/discussions ... m.php?f=28

That way you can have your own thread forever to keep updating as time goes on.

I need to get off my *** and do my 2 year update......

 

[Bone Daddy]

All joking aside, 3 month updates are very healthy for a number of reasons; not the least of which, giving the noobs hope.

I've noticed that not only has my crown filled in, but I'm growing hairs along my front hairline. My widows peaks seem to not be following suit as well, but some minor re-growth looks to be occurring.

I've had alot more itching and shedding in the past few days. I think a second shed (typical 3 month shed thats always reported) is coming my way.

Sometimes I think male pattern baldness itching on finasteride is good, sometimes bad. Right about now I'm thinking it's both.