Pompous? LOL, your reply comes across as pompous........I kept my post to the point and stuck to the facts
No, you didn't say that and now you're backpeddling.
You said he had a full head hair which I refuted. As the photo shows, Keef is in NW4 territory as I corrfectly stated.
You said nothing about "age appropriate" in your opening post so don't try to introduce that now.
View attachment 168758
Again, you said "full head of hair" and now you're backpeddling to "good coverage".
I didn't realise I had to provide "evidence" and I'm not here to serve you with links - but take a look at the video around the 30 second mark and you will clearly see that (sadly) Charlie Watts had a completely bald crown as I correctly stated.
Wrong again. I posted a link to an article (that I remembered seeing) where the Daily Mail correctly state that Macca's hair is thinning.
If you think that is a "full head of fcuking hair" then you're either not very observant or you need to make a trip to specsavers.
There's much better examples out there so don't be a lazy arse and do your own google search.
Oh and once again, leave out the "age appropriate" nonsense - you said nothing about that in your opening post.
No, they all paid their dues. I suugest you read Bill Wyman's book "Stone alone" which catalogs how the Stones slogged away for years on the club circuit and had to fight for recognition....and when they were recognised they were locked into punitive recording and management contracts where they saw very little money. The stones didn't have a day off for four years. The real wealth only happened when they progressed onto stadium tours and re-nogotiated recording contracts. All the guys you mentioned have similar stories. Completely the opposite to your glib statmement that "they havent done a tap in 50 odd years"
Comparing the entertainment business to other industries is another topic entirely and totally irrelevant
.