You say you have to keep going for the results, you chastise about it, but you've only been doing this for a month and a half.
So what? Nobody should draw conclusions on single cases. Instead, it should be done on larger samples. I base my conclusions in 1) published studies in which tests are performed with multiple subjects, and 2) Multiple anecdotal accounts of long term needles. If you say that for making an inference about the efficacy of something, the main requisite is trying it myself, then you don´t know a damn thing about statistics and the scientific method. Even if it turns out that microneedling didnt work for me, it DOES NOT mean it doesnt work and that the studies (and the success stories of some members here) are not geniune. Again, one more flawed argument from your side.
There are
some users who've got good results, others whose results are extremely dubious. Most get none at all or a meager, next-to-worthless result.
Again, that's just not how this works.
The most successful, and one of the only studies on this, did once-a-week rolling and assessed the results at 3 months.
THe most succesful and one of the only studies on this? You seem to be talking about the Indian study, and to make such an ignorant claim like this, it seems it is the only study you have read. Dude, for god's sake, plase have a well informed background on this issue before posting your opinion.
READ, READ, READ
-This is the study of Yu et al. published this year in June:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ced.13551
They reported results at 5 months. Also, there is statistical significance in hair count and hair thickness in the side of the head in which microneedling is also being applied. If your shitty claim stating that only a small minority of users respong to needling, then we shouldn't expect the numbers reported in this study, and we wouldnt also expect a p-value smaller than 0.05.
-This is the study of Sanjic et al. published in 2017
http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ijced&volume=3&issue=2&article=006
It is a shitty study compared to others, because there are no differential experimental treatments. Everyone is applied finas, minoxidil and microneedling every 15 days. I just put this here just to tell you that hair growth assesments were done at 6 months. Again, your 3 months bullshit is refuted.
-This is the study of Bao et al. published in 2017.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14764172.2017.1376094
Now THIS is the king of all studies. This is the one you should be reading the most before opening your mouth. THis tested the efficacy of needling alone, minoxidil alone, and the combo of both. Statistical significance was found between the 3 treatments. Needling alone was found to be slightly better than minoxidil alone. Again, if your dumb claims were true, we shouldn't expect the numbers we are seeing in those trials, and of course there wouldnt be statistical significance. Assessment was done at almost 6 moths.
So please, stop babbling about the three months bullshit and only referencing the Indian study again, and again and again.
If this method of DIY dermaroll + minoxidil is working, it will start working from the first or second session.
The facts are clear on this: If you've not seen results after 3 - 5 months, then it is not working for you.
This is just your empty speculation that is not supported by any kind of data. First you said it was 3 months, then you are extending it to 5. Ok, let´s assume it's 5. At least that number is closer to the studies that I just posted. Still, you just don´t know what happens to MOST people who needle beyong 5 months, because MOST of them do not needle anymore, everyone quitted. To draw such a conclusion you should ask those who has been doing it for many more months. We have at most 5 people on these forums who has been doing them. One of them even said that regrowth keeps kicking in even after a year, EVEN when he was a late responder. At the time, the only one who supports your claim is a dude who has been needling for 7 months and that hasnt reported any improvement yet. However, to generalize this outcome you need more guys going thru this, and at the very moment, it is clearly not the case. So, to summarize, a bunch of people quitting before 3 months is by no means a good dataset to support your ideas, and you have no data to claim that 3-5 months is the magic number to assess whether the treatment will or will not work.
Even with minoxidil and finasteride (the best treatments we have so far) the results at 3 months are poor predictors of the long term outcomes, and the scientific literature has shown this before.
Other useful bits of info for you:
-No, microneedling IS NOT only about folicle neogenesis. It improves the thickness of existing hair too. Check the study of Bao et al. (2017) that I just posted above.
-Microneedling also improves microcirculation (induces angiogenesis). So even if you get small vellus hairs at first, the gradually improving circulation around those small hairs should theoretically keep making those bigger in the long term.
-There are a lot of things we still don´t know about needling. We still lack long term studies so we do not know if those gains are maintained, or when regrowth reaches a plateau. The only long term data we have so far is from a few anecdotal accounts. Again, most of them do not support your claims.
I suppose there is a chance you will conveniently ignore this response, as you did with the other thread.
I apologize for my recurrent english mistakes. Not a native speaker.