- Reaction score
- 990
acording to my theory, repetitive scalp shaving or short hair lenght are triguering factor of common baldness
OK, an according to your theory why the sides and the backs don't go bald ? Are shaving resisting zones ?acording to my theory, repetitive scalp shaving or short hair lenght are triguering factor of common baldness
It s all around sebum. Sebum is vital for a healthy hair, but it must be created and "eliminated" continously (if not it oxidices and start the problem").OK, an according to your theory why the sides and the backs don't go bald ? Are shaving resisting zones ?
So why hair tranplants works ?It s all around sebum. Sebum is vital for a healthy hair, but it must be created and "eliminated" continously (if not it oxidices and start the problem").
High density and thicker hair aid in this issue by physical contact, and all night we have a contact whith pillow for hours , but only in certains scalp areas. Is it a good explanation for you?
These ideas bring me my theory about cultural aspects of common hair loss where women wore long hair and even in the night the hair of the top scalp can drain sebum, avoidind triggering factor as deteriorated sebum.
OTOH, I have the idea that sebum not only goes outward but inward flow to dermal papilla entering in the same hair shaft (important one in CB and shampoos make moreless nothing), but I can not give you a reference because there is not yet writen, only in my paper.
Cultural evolution as a possible triggering or causative factor of common baldness
Common baldness (alopecia) increasingly affects a higher number of individuals at earlier ages, independently of gender. One of the reasons could be l…www.sciencedirect.comCultural evolution as a possible triggering or causative factor of common baldness
I did end up getting a 23andMe test and it said I had the lowest possible probability of balding before age 40 (I believe 81% of no hairloss for europeans which was the lowest you could get provided european ancestry) That being said, I did have a few balding genes as well but it seemed to be a bit more positive than negative overall (about 66% positive 33% negative)The tests are more accurate than any other method I can think of. Certainly more accurate than making personal guesses based on relatives.
They'll basically give you a bunch of probabilities, and I think the probabilities are good estimates of what will happen to you.
Very bad. Both me and my sister have super thin/low density hair. Kinda strange since nobody else in my family does, even the people I knew that were balding. They all had thick hair. Oddly enough though my hair is pretty dark almost black, but its still thin (which usually you would expect the darker the hair strand the thicker but alas). Honestly my density is so bad I doubt I'll ever be able to get a hair transplanthow is your density and hair thickness?
Dense and thicker hair are less prone to develop common baldness, and also hair lenght is important, ..., see the diference between sexesdefinitely thinner blonde/red hair will more likely start going bald. thicker curlier darker hair falls out less. i think asians and native americans have the lowest rate of hair loss.