You just said ru does NOTHING.
ASC-J9 Group Buy: More than just an AR Degrader
- Thread starter pegasus2
- Start date
I don't think the problem here is the English language. Go drink some coffee and reevaluate your previous statements.
You are supposed to apply ru topically, not smoke it
If we know that {insert any hairloss treatment} doesn't work sometimes
The point here is the absurdity of you saying that Ru did nothing. How the hell could you know that? The problem here is arrogance. I was expecting you to say that ASC-j9 degraded all androgen receptors anf therefore ru did nothing. You couldn't prove such thing but at least thats an argument or a theory but all we got is arrogance
The point here is the absurdity of you saying that Ru did nothing. How the hell could you know that? The problem here is arrogance. I was expecting you to say that ASC-j9 degraded all androgen receptors anf therefore ru did nothing. You couldn't prove such thing but at least thats an argument or a theory but all we got is arrogance
Last edited:
That's IN THEORY. If hairloss drugs worked in theory, dutasteride would hsve solved hairloss decades ago but things aren't that simple. Idk who took those photos but that person is an idiot According to you for attacking hairloss by different flanks
Just baseless and senseless statements without support... All left is childish bullying.
And ironic and pathetic how you say I know nothing about "theory" (whatever you mean by that) and biology. This isn't even a question about biology but the SCIENTIFIC METHOD. You gladly accept a result of an experiment without a Control group. Scientists have a theory and test it to see if their theory is correct. You just assume is correct and call others idiots... What a loser
And ironic and pathetic how you say I know nothing about "theory" (whatever you mean by that) and biology. This isn't even a question about biology but the SCIENTIFIC METHOD. You gladly accept a result of an experiment without a Control group. Scientists have a theory and test it to see if their theory is correct. You just assume is correct and call others idiots... What a loser
- Reaction score
- 442
I mean throwing two AR degraders competing eachother on same pathway seems pretty useless. The whole point of a hairloss stack is to attack it from as many possible pathways without drugs competing for binding
Ru doesn't degrade ARs but inactivates them and there is no harm in adding it since if what's claimed is true (that Asc has more binding affinity to the ar than RU) then it won't matter either, just waste of Ru. On the other hand if RU is binding to ARs then it means that Acs isn't binding for some reason (not enough quantity? Is it being degraded somewhere in the epidermis?)
I can't believe that with all the paradoxes found in male pattern baldness can anyone suggest that it's good enough to take the drugs theorical interactions at face value. Next thing we know we see you saying in vivo and in vitro results should be the same.
With all that being said, it's fine to just use one of those since they do attack the AR but with different consequences. On the other hand I don't think anyone will stop taking finasteride.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 1,336
I leave you guys for a few months, and all I see is good old ASC-J9 back in action. What happened with the other UT degrader that was supposed to be 3x this one? Sincerely curious to hear the theory behind UT being worse for hair.
- Reaction score
- 217
You were the one that started the GB and promoted it as the next best thing, you should know.
- Reaction score
- 442
Isn't the official vehicle yellow curry