- Reaction score
- 42
Old Baldy said:Bryan: I read the posted exchange you had with Doctor Lee a while back and it was "weird". No doubt about that. He definitely didn't answer your question directly. All he had to say was "yes, but in my clinical experience AA is a good treatment".
Exactly!! If he had simply said from the beginning something like, "Yeah, I see that you're right...there's no real evidence that azelaic acid works in living humans; however, I still believe from my clinical experience that it's helpful for balding", then I wouldn't have said much more about it.
But what REALLY left a bad taste in my mouth is that he didn't say the above at all, he kept saying something to the effect, "Oh, there's LOTS of scientific evidence for it", and he'd keep posting studies showing (for example) that it works for acne; then I'd come back and say yeah, it works for acne because it's an ANTIBACTERIAL, damnit! Show me evidence that it reduces DHT! And then he'd say, oh there's TONS of evidence for that! And I'd say, in effect, SHOW ME SOME, DAMNIT!! He never was able to do that. He finally bailed-out of the discussion without producing any real evidence at all, and never admitted that there wasn't any.
Old Baldy said:However, I just can't bring myself to think of him as dishonest in any way. Maybe I'm being naive. I just like the guy and think he is very reputable.
Maybe there's a shadowy middle-ground, a sort of "Twilight Zone" between honesty and dishonesty. Maybe deep-down, he sees the inherent problems with the claims he makes for azelaic acid, but can't QUITE bring himself to acknowledge them to his customers, or even to himself. It's called being in denial! :wink:
Bryan