Bald Guy Scores A Hottie... And He's Not Even Rich

[Saurabhaj]

She probably only agreed to this because she has a fetish for f*****g fullheads while her pet cucked, bald loser cries in the corner while he watches.

I think you have limited experience .

 

[hairblues]

I think you have limited experience .

I think he may have too much experience

 

[hairblues]

You look like you are in your 30's and even early 30's.

lol not that young but I do have good genetics for aging and skin from both sides.

 

[Rudiger]

I'm gonna make a fake girlie account just so I can see y'all

 

[JeanLucBB]

I think he may have too much experience

Dem cuck fetish baes

 

[hairblues]

Dem cuck fetish baes

You better use 2 condoms.

 

[EvilLocks]

I was joking with the privileged comment, I wrote lol after. I didn't say I don't believe that you didn't read my post, I just explained why I made the post in the first place. You told me to chill, but you are the one overreacting and assuming.

Re-read your own posts, I don't think I'm overreacting at all.

Are you kidding me? You say you agree with @hairblues , but are basically just rewriting my entire post that was posted before hers. You're even using the same wording as in my post. I wouldn't even comment on this, but it just seems so obvious. Is it because I said that @Nano123 is privileged? lmao

One thing was the fact that we used the same phrase the other was that you posted pretty much the same as I already posted while agreeing with someone else. Thought you had read all the posts in a short thread you posted in, my bad I guess.

First of all, you were the one assuming things in the first place, but if you read all the posts in this ''short'' thread as you called it, you would have seen that @hairblues tagged me on page 3 or something asking me a question about this girl. So I did what anyone would do, go back to page 1 and look at the girl, quickly skim through the first page then make my reply. Then out of nowhere you come accusing me of copying your post, in addition to presuming (or so I thought) that it was because you said this and that to some girl. Adding the ''lmao'' is not exactly a clear sign that you were joking, maybe I'm just bad at getting jokes but in my mind it could also mean that you were mocking me for being so petty, hence the ''lmao''

Then, let's take a look at your second reply. It was not so much what you wrote, but the whole tone of the post (especially the part I highlighted)
Calling it a ''short thread that I posted in'' would imply that I must have read all the posts, hence why I said you didn't believe me.

Anyway, I'm not really that mad, I just don't like to be accused of something I did not do.

 

[buckthorn]

I don't ride horses that way
.

Ohhh... once you see my unlimited, rock hard boners from finasteride, you'll change your mind. haha

 

[buckthorn]

I'm gonna make a fake girlie account just so I can see y'all

goddamn, you're a f*****g genius.

 

[EvilLocks]

goddamn, you're a f*****g genius.

But.. haven't you already seen us girls?

 

[tomcat]

am i only one who thinks hes good looking guy???

 

[tomcat]

Yes

damn where is my redpill...

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

Re-read your own posts, I don't think I'm overreacting at all.




First of all, you were the one assuming things in the first place, but if you read all the posts in this ''short'' thread as you called it, you would have seen that @hairblues tagged me on page 3 or something asking me a question about this girl. So I did what anyone would do, go back to page 1 and look at the girl, quickly skim through the first page then make my reply. Then out of nowhere you come accusing me of copying your post, in addition to presuming (or so I thought) that it was because you said this and that to some girl. Adding the ''lmao'' is not exactly a clear sign that you were joking, maybe I'm just bad at getting jokes but in my mind it could also mean that you were mocking me for being so petty, hence the ''lmao''

Then, let's take a look at your second reply. It was not so much what you wrote, but the whole tone of the post (especially the part I highlighted)
Calling it a ''short thread that I posted in'' would imply that I must have read all the posts, hence why I said you didn't believe me.

Anyway, I'm not really that mad, I just don't like to be accused of something I did not do.

This is going nowhere. I don't know why you're getting your panties in a bunch, I literally said my bad in the first post after you said you didn't read the thread. And 3 pages is short.

 

[Trichosan]

Yeah, she's got a bit of a high smile line with that slightly over developed maxilla but it fits her face. She's a cutie and I'd bet she has a great sense of style and carries herself well. Definitely a genetic plus to his offspring.

 

[EvilLocks]

This is going nowhere. I don't know why you're getting your panties in a bunch, I literally said my bad in the first post after you said you didn't read the thread. And 3 pages is short.

K

 

[hairblues]

am i only one who thinks hes good looking guy???

Yes

 

[CaptainForehead]

I'm gonna make a fake girlie account just so I can see y'all

Ladies, I identify as a woman. Send me your pictures.

 

[kj6723]

Ouch shots fired @kj6723

No doubt. She's been making a laughing stock of me lately

I'm going to pretend she's flirting with me as it's better for my self esteem

 

[hairblues]

No doubt. She's been making a laughing stock of me lately

I'm going to pretend she's flirting with me as it's better for my self esteem

Okay okay I will stop

The teddy bear comment was too good to pass up though.

 

[EvilLocks]

Yes

He's slightly below average. NW7, short (unless she is very tall), on the heavier side, beta features etc. Still, I would not call him ugly. I would not pass him on the streets and think ''eww'', but I would not give him a second look either. He blends into the crowd.