What claims of mine have been addressed -
1. Other than your fool opinion, where did you prove that macaques and humans respond to topical treatments similarily? Where are the studies demonstrating this assertion by you?
2. Other than your fool opinion, where did you prove that some enzyme explains why humans respond worse to topical 2% minoxidil than macaques?
Where are the studies that prove this assertion by you?
3. And even if it's true, which I doubt that it is, that some enzyme limits the efficacy of 2% minoxidil in humans but not in macaques, then that proves I'm right about it being easier to regrow hair on macaques than on humans. After all, you yourself agree that 2% minoxidil works better on macaques than humans, while you also claim I'm wrong about it being easier to regrow hair on macaques than on humans. You're talking out of both sides of your mouth, mate.
4. And why would some liver enzyme allegedly prevent TOPICAL minoxidil from working while allowing ORAL minoxidil to work? WTF is up with that nonsense? Are you saying that your infamous, minoxidil-killing liver enzyme can tell if minoxidil is applied topically or taken orally? LMAO!