CaptainForehead
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 4,302
It's the standard advice and it's incorrect.
The metabolic theory of obesity is simply a lot more effective at actually helping people than the caloric theory.
It's known from studies that if you crash men's caloric consumption to 1,500 calories a day and make them exercise the most likely outcome is initial weight loss, followed by metabolic adaptation, followed by weight gain to an even higher weight than where the men started. By and large, the overwhelming majority of subjects in "calories in, calories out" weight loss studies don't achieve long-term weight loss.
It's much better to focus on hormones and metabolic effects:what you're eating and when you're eating it, rather than only how much you're eating.
I'd like to look at these studies, I'm sure they have holes in them.
In my opinion, movement is quite effective. By movement, I don't mean cardio three times a week. I mean movement in your daily life. Living in Europe, this is what I've experienced.
To go to work: I walk
To get lunch: I walk
To get groceries: I walk
To go to the gym: I walk
The calories expended in walking by themselves are not that much, but being in constant movement has a bit of an appetite suppressing effect. If I'm stationary, I can overeat and feel fine. If I have to move, I feel a bit sick.
Also, if you're reducing calories, you have to shift towards nutrient rich foods just because you're not eating as much and still need to get nutrients in.
Growing up, and till recently when I would visit my brother, I would get sh*t for eating lots of vegetables. "People don't eat so much vegetables!"
"I just bought vegetables a couple days ago, you've gone through it all??!"
"People will find you weird if you eat so much vegetables!"
I'm not getting sh*t for my dietary habits now.