yes countries like qatar is responsible they were the first to support NATO to help against gaddafi but they did it for gas really do they can control gas production in the whole area
gaddafi had a gr8 plans for the future for libya and Africa he planned units the currency of all Africa under Telogen Effluvium name of african dinner and that upset alot of western countries like france cuz they have lots if intrest in Africa if u remember the French government was going to attack the fleet that was send to bengazie even if uan didn't approve
as fot haftir he is doing a good job in the east but its hard to do anything in the west we are community that has tribes lots of tribs wont join him and still by legion to gaddafi like werfala and the south but the south are slredy teamed with him tripoli is with him but the issue in tripoli is it has all kind of militia so its hard to make a move and even say that ur with haftir its like the same dictatorship all over again
any one in libya says the he still supports 17of feb is benefits from it cuz it only brought us death and hunger
where are u from ? glad to c u support my thoughts cus many western believed this lie about arab spring
My parents are North African Jews who immigrated to Canada, mother is from Morocco and dad is from Tunisia. During the Libya war of 2011, I was living in the USA and paying an unusually high level of attention to politics, so I saw through the BS.
During the war it was barely discussed in North America. It was just "Obama wants to go help people", the media said that Ghadaffi was going to kill 100,000 innocent civilians, and that he was going to give v**** to his troops so they could rape people. People supported the war because they perceived Ghadaffi as evil, because the western countries were united, and because Obama had a good reputation. I would say that of north americans with an opinion, 80-90% agreed with the war. Most of the people opposed were those on the extreme left and the extreme right, in the center there was a consensus.
In contrast to Iraq 2003, there was a lot of opposition. France and Germany were opposed so Bush didn't have an alliance which undermined him politically. Also, when Bush goes to war people think it's because of oil, when Obama goes to war people think it's because of wanting to help people. That's one of the issues with American policy -- it is easier for a democratic party president to go to war.
Iraq 2003 and Libya 2011 are very similar in that a decision was made to use the military to remove a country's long-time dictator. However, Iraq was very discussed and debated. Libya, however, the media and the population barely discussed.
Obama now recognizes the Libya war as the greatest mistake of his presidency. He has said so many times. When the decision to attack was taking place, they weren't sure, there were voices for and voices against. What swayed Obama was that then secretary of state Hillary Clinton was extremely enthusiastic about going to war, she tipped the scales. What they believed was that the situation was unstable, so the USA should go in and take control.
The French government is also complicit. They are basically running an empire in Africa, getting a lot of money for free.
What do you think the Arab spring was about? I believe it was genuine, but that once the energy was unleashed, it was taken over by the wrong people.
Arab peoples are the second most oppressed people on Earth, only Blacks are more oppressed. They need a revolution, but it's very hard to achieve a revolution, particularly when the USA, Europe, and most of the Arab governments are united against Arab peoples. Unfortunately, I see no solutions.
