@RegenWaiting
I don't think it's more studied. Frankly, I can't even find much research about "Eucapil"? Maybe I'm just too blind too see it
. But yeah RU58841 is most definitely more potent. There are absolutely no problems with the stability of RU58841, not even in a solution.
Remember, RU58841 is literally sold over the counter in Indonesia in pharmacies (pretty funny). Also so many people have tried the stuff already.
I always made 2-3 weekly batches with RU58841 and dumped it into Kirkland. Always worked fine. I wouldn't worry that much about stability. Yes, I would dissolve it into minoxidil. Works great and has a synergistic effect.
I see your point. Yes, I knew about Indonesia.
I won't bother about the studies of Eucapil now, it's some Czech farma that conducted those.
I agree with you.
Just to clarify; you dump RU in kirkland minoxidil, but not in 60ml at a time (their bottles), but in a smaller bottle in which you mix kirkland + RU together which lasts you approx a couple of days?
Could you define ''a batch'' for me? Not a native english...
Thank you for your opinion
Cheers
EDIT:
The study, at least one of'em:
BACKGROUND: Fluridil, a novel topical antiandrogen, suppresses the human androgen receptor. While highly hydrophobic and hydrolytically degradable, it is systemically nonresorbable. In animals, fluridil demonstrated high local and general tolerance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a topical anti- androgen, fluridil, in male androgenetic alopecia. METHODS: In 20 men, for 21 days, occlusive forearm patches with 2, 4, and 6% fluridil, isopropanol, and/or vaseline were applied. In 43 men with androgenetic alopecia (Androgenetic Alopecia), Norwood grade II-Va, 2% fluridil was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study after 3 months clinically by phototrichograms, hematology, and blood chemistry including analysis for fluridil, and at 9 months by phototrichograms. RESULTS: Neither fluridil nor isopropanol showed sensitization/irritation potential, unlike vaseline. In all Androgenetic Alopecia subjects, baseline anagen/telogen counts were equal. After 3 months, the average anagen percentage did not change in placebo subjects, but increased in fluridil subjects from 76% to 85%, and at 9 months to 87%. In former placebo subjects, fluridil increased the anagen percentage after 6 months from 76% to 85%. Sexual functions, libido, hematology, and blood chemistry values were normal throughout, except that at 3 months, in the spring, serum testosterone increased within the normal range equally in placebo and fluridil groups. No fluridil or its decomposition product, BP-34, was detectable in the serum at 0, 3, or 90 days. CONCLUSION: Topical fluridil is nonirritating, nonsensitizing, nonresorbable, devoid of systemic activity, and anagen promoting after daily use in most Androgenetic Alopecia males.