Jacob
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 44
In my mind, articles in scientific reviews are written by specialists of the domain ... If I check the doctor who signed the article is Dr. Akio Sato in Japan, this guy has found a way to regenerate hair : http://www.reuters.com/video/2012/04/18/hair-regeneration-study-a-boost-for-the?videoId=233552496 !!! not that bad, in fact ... :unsure:
So, I am curious ... would this kind of doctor publish an article (even in a "small" review) of a product which is snake oil ? would he take this kind of risk on his own reputation ??
About the clown and his pictures, you are talking about ... which proof do we have to be sure that's a clown ??? :hmmm: :tellme:
To answer your question about the Japanese doctor...yes. I've seen worse. But let's play along with the "study". Did they compare it with other topicals? Is the one picture they have there their best example? I've seen pictures of the use of procyanidins that showed better results. It's possible what they did there actually is legit..but with the use of finasteride for at least 3 years I'd love to see it compared to any # of things out there.
What proof do we have that he's a clown? Spam'n nearly every forum(and getting banned in nearly all of them) with the same stupid pictures- even if you ask for a better angle etc he still comes back with the same crap. In one picture he's showing "new growth" and the next picture(s) that area has hair 3+ inches long when he's showing an "update" for another area, etc.
- - - Updated - - -
Actually here it says only 16 participants..maybe in the other it mentions some dropping out or ?: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Legacy-Healthcare-Dr-Akio-Sato-4357960.S.177038797