G
Guest
Guest
[/quote:08db1]Cutsinger is God said:badasshairday said:badasshairday said:badasshairday said:[quote="Diamond Dave":08db1][quote="Cutsinger is God":08db1]Perhaps we are a little confused Gardener. Diamond Dave and I have been talking about head hair not body hair. Of course soap has the opposite effect on body hair.
I was gonna say that CIG but I knew that would go way over the heads of most people here.
Okay, so why is it that I only experienced a massive increase in body hair only during puberty? After that my body hair has remained stagnant or about the same.
My reason, the massive increase in testosterone.
CIG what is your reasoning?
Still no answer.
This is getting ridiculous. They are basically denying that sex hormones do nothing to the body and soap is the reason why I grew hair on my chest and armpits as I went through puberty.
Ok badasshairday,
We are talking about The Cause of Baldness NOT the growing body hair during puberty. The cause of baldness according to Cutsinger has always been soap and shampoo. Cut the Suds is his method and you will increase those lost buds.
Once boys age to 9 to 13, they all grow more body hair. What happens then is the boys and girls start to pay attention to their appearance and this is really where shampoo and soap take on an added dimension. Teens will shower more, use more hair gels, more soap, more hair spray etc. Well as this increases so does the damage SLS causes. It's a very very slow yet progressive process depending on how thick one's hair is. The thicker the hair(Joe Namath of the NY JETs) the longer it takes to go bald. The thinner the hair (example: Matt Hasselbeck qb of the Seattle Seahawks) the quicker shampoo does it's nasty work on follicles.
This is why you see alot of late teens and early 20 somethings with naturally born thinner hair start to lose their hair earlier than those with naturally born thicker shaft hairs. Had Matt Hasselbeck never used any shampoo or soap he would no doubt have a thick head of hair.
I see a future where based on the thickness of one's hair where teachers at schools will be able to determine which students could use shampoo and which ones absolutely shouldn't. Each student's follicle's would be analyzed to see if it would be more susceptible to quicker damage of SLS based on the Cutsinger model which is yet to be developed. Again, this is just what my vision of the future could possibly be. If this does happen, this will all go back to the tireless and thankless work of Lawrence Cutsinger and his followers like me and Diamond Dave. Someday and hopefully soon I hope he can show everyone in July what cutting out the suds can really do after 11 years. I also look forward to his potential appearance on Oprah. Once that happens trust me the entire world will know. That's how big Oprah is.
So there you have it baddasshairday. I don't ever want to hear you crying an moaning for anymore explainations. You cried and whined now eat it!! I answered your **** question. No Mas!![/quote:08db1]
You are using so many assumptions its not even funny. I've always had the craziest thickest hair out of everyone I know yet I was afflicted with male pattern baldness very early.
Wow your reasoning is ridiculous. First you tell the Gardener that he grew more hair on his body and lost hair on his h ead because soap has the opposite affect on body hair. Now are you trying to tell me that hormones play a role in body hair and sex drive? You are saying sex drive makes us shower more to attract the opposite sex thats why we go bald?
I'm growing tired of this craptastic bullshit theories you have. You obviously lack an elementary understanding of human physiology.