- Reaction score
- 453
Not 10/10. 8/10 I think. He has very solid jawline but his maxilla is not that good. It's a bit vertical. You can see under his eyes that the support is not that great.
Craniofacial development - The thing that make us lose hair(A hair loss theory)
- Thread starter Mitko1
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 453
@nimayazdani78 I think that I overrated Keira Knightley. She's more like a 5/10 not 7/10. She has pretty receded hairline and a notable degree of scull expansion.
As you can see her maxillar bones are pretty narrow.
As you can see her maxillar bones are pretty narrow.
- Reaction score
- -19
@Mitko1 I just watched the Terminator movies and i think Linda Hamilton does have a very good facial structure:9/10
I think you overrated Kevin Debruyne -He is not a 9/10,very solid but doesnt have a strong jaw or cheeks. 8/10
Joseph Stalin was indeed a handsome man he was a 9/10 and that's why he had a head full of hair till he died.
I think you overrated Kevin Debruyne -He is not a 9/10,very solid but doesnt have a strong jaw or cheeks. 8/10
Joseph Stalin was indeed a handsome man he was a 9/10 and that's why he had a head full of hair till he died.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 453
I personally don't think that I overrated De Bruyne. He looks very handsome to me. Stalin is 8/10. Not so good and symetrical facial structure.
- Reaction score
- 165
Can you please find more evidence regarding neck and posture. Appreciate you have tons of facial structure and I agree with theory to some extent, but only a couple of examples with neck.
I believe neck tension and position is also critical and can block maxillary artery which supplies the scalp with blood and nutrients.
- Reaction score
- 453
I can't post find good pictures unfortunately. Back in the thread I posted some images of men that can serve as evidence.
- Reaction score
- 453
@Ritchie One thing that I notice is that criminals are rarely good looking. Almost all of them have poor facial structure and most of them are balding.
There's probably negative energy that builds up inside them because society treats good looking people better. They get mad and then become criminals.
There's probably negative energy that builds up inside them because society treats good looking people better. They get mad and then become criminals.
- Reaction score
- 165
It's hard to find evidence and picture of the correct angle but I believe this is related to the craniofacial problem.
Incorrect head position and neck angle greatly impacts the sternocleidomastoid muscle which then restricts the functioning of the maxillary artery imo.
- Reaction score
- 453
@Ritchie Jennifer Garner is another mere proof that women in their teens and 20's aren't the best looking women. She didn't peak until her 30's.
Pictured at age 32 she looks much better than she did at her 22 year old birthday
To me at 39 she looks even more beatiful.
She has 6/10 face but to me still looks very pretty.
Pictured at age 32 she looks much better than she did at her 22 year old birthday
To me at 39 she looks even more beatiful.
She has 6/10 face but to me still looks very pretty.
this is entirely dependent on hair density and longevity
- Reaction score
- 453
@nimayazdani78 Another person I think I overrated is Sergio Ramos. He's 5/10 not 7. His beard is concealing his facial flaws.
He has too weak jawline and too narrow palate for a 7.
He has too weak jawline and too narrow palate for a 7.
- Reaction score
- 453
- Reaction score
- -19
Do you think it’s the same for men too? Show us with examples,
- Reaction score
- 453
I don't really know. I will check.
- Reaction score
- 453
@Ritchie I personally believe that literally every man can get a girlfriend. More men than women are born but this is because since birth men are more likely to die and nature creates a reserve of men. By age 20 in most countries men and women become about the same in numbers and after 25 often there are already more women than men. That means that there will be plenty of lonely women that will be unable to find a boyfriend/husband for them. When there are less options women will be less picky.
For example if you look at the democraphics of France on the WHO page you will notice that men and women 20-24 are roughly equal and after 25 there are more women.
data.who.int
The latter is true also for Portugal and probably many other countries. That's good because as we know women 25-29 is when most women peak, are in their prime and are the most attractive.
Even if women surpass men in the 30-34 that's still good because many women peak in this age range but even if they are past their prime they are still formidable and fertile.
For example if you look at the democraphics of France on the WHO page you will notice that men and women 20-24 are roughly equal and after 25 there are more women.
France
Health data overview for France, containing the latest population, life expectancy and mortality data from WHO.
The latter is true also for Portugal and probably many other countries. That's good because as we know women 25-29 is when most women peak, are in their prime and are the most attractive.
Even if women surpass men in the 30-34 that's still good because many women peak in this age range but even if they are past their prime they are still formidable and fertile.
- Reaction score
- 453
@Ritchie even in countries like Denmark or Germany where men are a litle bit more than women in 25-29 group and 30-34 men still have the advantage because conditions that retire people from dating are more common in men. Physical and metal disabilities are far more common in men than in women, homosexuality is also more common in men. There are twice as many gay man as are lesbian women. Also more men transition to become women than vice versa. They then date men and there are more men taken.