harold
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 11
Maybe this should be in the sides forum but I thinnk this has a slightly braoader applicability and to be honest this forum gets a lot more views. I guess it can always be moved by the mods.
Anyway there is a line of thinking that the reason some people (the exact numbers being a highly contentious issue round here) experience sides on dutasteride/finasteride is because of the rise in estrogen/estradiol produced by the shutdown of pathways converting test to DHT and the subsequent rise in test. Or perhaps more importantly it is the shift in the androgen/estrogen ratio that is causing the sides. DHT has effectively antiestrogenic effects in many parts of the body such as the chest so when you are lowering DHT as well as raising estrogen its possible that you are doubling the odds against you.
On the other hand there is the possibility that DHT is necessary for errectile function, libido and general normal sexual functioning. Without it you are screwed more or less and any excess estrogen will only have an effect on things like gyno and perhaps extra fat deposition. After all DHT does seem to be necessary (at least at physiological levels - discounting the recent study where it managed to destroy even occipital scalp hair at high enough concentrations) for hairloss going by pseudohemaphrodites and the majority of users of finasteride/dutasteride who show at least maintenance. If this is true and even large increases in test do not produce worsening of balding in the absence of DHT then it may well be true that even large increases in testosterone won't make up for the loss of DHT in androgenic areas such as the brain and genitals .ie too llittle DHT = sexual sides.
On the other hand there are a lot of people who have close to normal to normal sexual function (some evn claim improvements) while inhibiting huge ammounts of DHT in the body. Should this be possible. Is it just that although 90% of serum DHT may be inhibited the 60-70% or so reduction in sexually related organs leaves just enough to keep them going? Does the question of whether you are going to respond well hairwise and/or not respond well sexually comee down to whether or not your scalp is more sensitive to small levels of DHT/testosterone than your penis?
Or do these people respond without sides because in the absence of huge ammounts of estrogen and its negative feedback upon the HPTA there is more than enough androgens to produce normal sexual response? Basically what it comes down to I guess is that if its primarily DHT that is responsible for sexual function then those who have intolerable sides on finasteride/dutasteride can't really hope to derive any benefit from these meds. If on the other hand it is primarily a redution in the androgen/estrogen ratio that screws up these folkss then there may be hope that with the use of arommatase inhibitors and SERMs that they can still derive some benefit from what are usually very effective meds. Unless of course one cannot achieve a balance between estrogenic and androgenic effects such that the scalp is protected and sexual function is also preserved. (ie by taking enough anti-estrogen to restore errections etc you will inevitably lose hair.)
I know these are questions that we probably dont have enough info to answer but there are some pretty knowledgeable folk here and perhaps more importantly some psople who have had experiences with combining dutasteride/finasteride with an anti-aromatase like arimidex/letro or a SERM like clomid/nolva. If anyone can list their experiences (did it help sexual sides, did you shed more) that would be a big help. Going through the archives there seem to be reports of people doing or at least planning such things but as so often happens there is no follow-up report of what happened.
The correct answer may well be that it is a bit of both and varies from individual to individual but if we can come up with something that means less people need to choose between having a head of hair and having sex that would be a great thing.
Below I will post some abstracts of studies and maybe some facts/observations that may shed light on the issue.
hh
And please lets not have a big flame war between those who never got sides and those who have. Such a thing helps nobody.
Anyway there is a line of thinking that the reason some people (the exact numbers being a highly contentious issue round here) experience sides on dutasteride/finasteride is because of the rise in estrogen/estradiol produced by the shutdown of pathways converting test to DHT and the subsequent rise in test. Or perhaps more importantly it is the shift in the androgen/estrogen ratio that is causing the sides. DHT has effectively antiestrogenic effects in many parts of the body such as the chest so when you are lowering DHT as well as raising estrogen its possible that you are doubling the odds against you.
On the other hand there is the possibility that DHT is necessary for errectile function, libido and general normal sexual functioning. Without it you are screwed more or less and any excess estrogen will only have an effect on things like gyno and perhaps extra fat deposition. After all DHT does seem to be necessary (at least at physiological levels - discounting the recent study where it managed to destroy even occipital scalp hair at high enough concentrations) for hairloss going by pseudohemaphrodites and the majority of users of finasteride/dutasteride who show at least maintenance. If this is true and even large increases in test do not produce worsening of balding in the absence of DHT then it may well be true that even large increases in testosterone won't make up for the loss of DHT in androgenic areas such as the brain and genitals .ie too llittle DHT = sexual sides.
On the other hand there are a lot of people who have close to normal to normal sexual function (some evn claim improvements) while inhibiting huge ammounts of DHT in the body. Should this be possible. Is it just that although 90% of serum DHT may be inhibited the 60-70% or so reduction in sexually related organs leaves just enough to keep them going? Does the question of whether you are going to respond well hairwise and/or not respond well sexually comee down to whether or not your scalp is more sensitive to small levels of DHT/testosterone than your penis?
Or do these people respond without sides because in the absence of huge ammounts of estrogen and its negative feedback upon the HPTA there is more than enough androgens to produce normal sexual response? Basically what it comes down to I guess is that if its primarily DHT that is responsible for sexual function then those who have intolerable sides on finasteride/dutasteride can't really hope to derive any benefit from these meds. If on the other hand it is primarily a redution in the androgen/estrogen ratio that screws up these folkss then there may be hope that with the use of arommatase inhibitors and SERMs that they can still derive some benefit from what are usually very effective meds. Unless of course one cannot achieve a balance between estrogenic and androgenic effects such that the scalp is protected and sexual function is also preserved. (ie by taking enough anti-estrogen to restore errections etc you will inevitably lose hair.)
I know these are questions that we probably dont have enough info to answer but there are some pretty knowledgeable folk here and perhaps more importantly some psople who have had experiences with combining dutasteride/finasteride with an anti-aromatase like arimidex/letro or a SERM like clomid/nolva. If anyone can list their experiences (did it help sexual sides, did you shed more) that would be a big help. Going through the archives there seem to be reports of people doing or at least planning such things but as so often happens there is no follow-up report of what happened.
The correct answer may well be that it is a bit of both and varies from individual to individual but if we can come up with something that means less people need to choose between having a head of hair and having sex that would be a great thing.
Below I will post some abstracts of studies and maybe some facts/observations that may shed light on the issue.
hh
And please lets not have a big flame war between those who never got sides and those who have. Such a thing helps nobody.
