Dilbert Creator Scott Adams On Trump, Women

Afro_Vacancy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
11,939
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/09/dil...esters-hypnotized-zombie-boys-in-black-masks/

“Dilbert” creator Scott Adams calls Berkeley protesters “hypnotized zombie-boys in black masks”
The cartoonist fears they will "possibly try to club me to death if I walk on campus"
Matthew Rozsa
dilbert_creators_ever_worsening_pr_crisis-620x412.jpg

Cartoonist Scott Adams, best known as the creator of “Dilbert,” published a blog post last week that criticized the University of California-Berkeley protesters who objected to the speech planned by Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos. Although according to Adams’ post, the only thing noteworthy about Yiannopoulos is that he’s a “Jewish gay immigrant who has an African-American boyfriend.”

“I’ve decided to side with the Jewish gay immigrant who has an African-American boyfriend, not the hypnotized zombie-boys in black masks who were clubbing people who hold different points of view,” Adams wrote. “I feel that’s reasonable, but I know many will disagree, and possibly try to club me to death if I walk on campus.”

The following day, Adams continued spinning the right-wing persecution complex narrative.

“One of the most underrated qualities of Republicans is that they police their own ranks. If you have a problem with a violent Republican racist, call some Republicans. They’ll solve it for you,” Adams wrote.

Adams, you’ll recall, said in October that he’d kill Donald Trump if he became too “Hitler-ish.”

“But don’t call a Republican if you are simply offended by another person’s opinion. In that situation you want to call some Democrats to ridicule and physically attack the person with the objectionable opinion,” Adams added, noting that he is not a Republican.

However, he endorsed Mitt Romney for president in 2012 and supported Donald Trump in 2016 (while accusing Clinton supporters of being “bullies”).

“Of all the bizarre spectacles that the Trump campaign has created, at the top of the list is the obsession the ‘Dilbert’ cartoonist has with trying to convince America that his obvious hero worship of Trump is somehow a cool, detached analysis from a man who isn’t even interested in voting for the guy,” observed Salon’s Amanda Marcotte.

In June, Adams wrote a post called “The humiliation of the American male in 2016,” which cited a dishwasher detergent commercial as proof that “the humiliation of American men is now institutionalized in the media.” That posted also claimed Adams was endorsing Hillary Clinton for president “for my personal safety” and demanded that feminists “STOP TELLING ME IN YOUR MIND THAT WOMEN HAVE IT WORSE IN THIS COUNTRY THAN MEN!”

He implied that ISIS liked Hillary Clinton better because there were no terrorists attacks before the elections.

In 2015, Adams published a post called “The Global Gender War” complaing that when he goes on a date, “access to sex is strictly controlled by the woman. If the woman has additional preferences in terms of temperature, beverages, and whatnot, the man generally complies. If I fall in love and want to propose, I am expected to do so on my knees, to set the tone for the rest of the marriage.”
 

Dench57

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
6,428
The Impact of Hair Loss?

i will PM admin to delete this thread, too off-topic
 

Dench57

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
6,428

Afro_Vacancy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
11,939
What part, I've read what you posted, I'm not clicking on a Salon link.

The Trump part is off-topic, but in the same article they discuss his views on women, which are on-topic. I'm not going to split up the article into separate pieces for two separate forums. Here are two paragraphs from the bottom:

In June, Adams wrote a post called “The humiliation of the American male in 2016,” which cited a dishwasher detergent commercial as proof that “the humiliation of American men is now institutionalized in the media.” That posted also claimed Adams was endorsing Hillary Clinton for president “for my personal safety” and demanded that feminists “STOP TELLING ME IN YOUR MIND THAT WOMEN HAVE IT WORSE IN THIS COUNTRY THAN MEN!”

In 2015, Adams published a post called “The Global Gender War” complaing that when he goes on a date, “access to sex is strictly controlled by the woman. If the woman has additional preferences in terms of temperature, beverages, and whatnot, the man generally complies. If I fall in love and want to propose, I am expected to do so on my knees, to set the tone for the rest of the marriage.”


Tell me, do the above two paragraphs sound familiar to you? Do they sound like they could be written by some of the men on this forum? Can you suggest any reasons why that might be?

It might be that he's NW4 (5?) and he doesn't have the face to pull of being bald. He doesn't live the fantasy life that the media claims all white men lead. So his eyes are opened up to brutal reality, and he's independently arriving at many of the same or similar conclusions that people on this forum have.
 

resu

Senior Member
Reaction score
1,349
The Trump part is off-topic, but in the same article they discuss his views on women, which are on-topic. I'm not going to split up the article into separate pieces for two separate forums. Here are two paragraphs from the bottom:

In June, Adams wrote a post called “The humiliation of the American male in 2016,” which cited a dishwasher detergent commercial as proof that “the humiliation of American men is now institutionalized in the media.” That posted also claimed Adams was endorsing Hillary Clinton for president “for my personal safety” and demanded that feminists “STOP TELLING ME IN YOUR MIND THAT WOMEN HAVE IT WORSE IN THIS COUNTRY THAN MEN!”

In 2015, Adams published a post called “The Global Gender War” complaing that when he goes on a date, “access to sex is strictly controlled by the woman. If the woman has additional preferences in terms of temperature, beverages, and whatnot, the man generally complies. If I fall in love and want to propose, I am expected to do so on my knees, to set the tone for the rest of the marriage.”


Tell me, do the above two paragraphs sound familiar to you? Do they sound like they could be written by some of the men on this forum? Can you suggest any reasons why that might be?

It might be that he's NW4 (5?) and he doesn't have the face to pull of being bald. He doesn't live the fantasy life that the media claims all white men lead. So his eyes are opened up to brutal reality, and he's independently arriving at many of the same or similar conclusions that people on this forum have.

I did get the tone of the text but it could applied to men in general not just those suffering from hair loss. I should add, humiliation of the white men because how often do you see the oposite? Not often. It's a search for control of the power.
 

Afro_Vacancy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
11,939
I did get the tone of the text but it could applied to men in general not just those suffering from hair loss. I should add, humiliation of the white men because how often do you see the oposite? Not often. It's a search for control of the power.

Hair loss is only one of many ways to be unattractive. A man with feminine bone structure, who is short, etc is likely to arrive at many of the same conclusions.

I am not going to go check, but I'm sure half the posts written here could find their way in a midget talk support forum and would fit right in.

In terms of white male privilege I think it's a simplistic world view. If you're white, male, healthy, attractive, rich, smart, tall, then yes you're living life on God mode. The top people in society predominantly fit those criteria. That leads people and the media to think that all white men live easier lives.

The effect of this incomplete world view is that white men with incomplete privilege (aka are not privileged) end up being pushed further down the social status ladder.
 

SmoothSailing

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
3,149

Really worth a watch. Jordan is spot on in every point he makes.

It's funny that the more progressive countries, with the most equalized playing fields for different genders, actually often end up with greater gender diversity in careers. He explained that really well I think.
 

hairblues

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
8,249
http://offsettingbehaviour.blogspot.com/2011/08/discriminating-against-ugly.html
Obviously not news to anyone here, but there's a nod in the quote towards a study that found that attractiveness is something like 70% or so objective. I'm not sure of the exact numbers and I may be misrembering them, but there's evidence that we're definitely not just imagining it when we say that baldness, extreme shortness and other aesthetic maladies have negatively affected our life qualities in a tangible and significant way. I, for one, would actually support some kind of anti-discrimination law against the slightly-below-average to terribly-unattractive. Or at least something that recognises the privileges incredibly good looking people are privy to and did something to try and find some way of curtailing them. I'm not talking about romantic advantages here, but professional. Indeed, I would even go as far as to say that certain industries, like high-end fashion, in which someone's exceptional facial symmetry can essentially gift them an income for life, should be disbarred. It sounds incredibly draconian, but it's not as though these companies couldn't just use very life-like mannequins or computer generated images to model their products (rather than people). And live events like the London and Paris fashion shows, for example, add little to the material economy at all. They certainly don't produce anything of concrete value. It's basically just glamorised (and very soft) p*rn.

NYC fashion week
  • Number of visitors 150,000.
  • Total income 574 million dollars.
  • Municipality income 64 million dollars.
  • Business income 509 million dollars.
  • Venue income 201 million dollars.
  • Restaurant income 149 million dollars.
  • Retail income 120 million dollars.
  • Accommodation income 103 million dollars.

Does not seem so little to me for one week.
 

Afro_Vacancy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
11,939
NYC fashion week
  • Number of visitors 150,000.
  • Total income 574 million dollars.
  • Municipality income 64 million dollars.
  • Business income 509 million dollars.
  • Venue income 201 million dollars.
  • Restaurant income 149 million dollars.
  • Retail income 120 million dollars.
  • Accommodation income 103 million dollars.

Does not seem so little to me for one week.

Could you comment on the last two sentences of his post?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DBW

rclark

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,773

Wouldn't want to get in physical fight with a cartoonist. They would f*** me up, so bad.

Especially the Calvin and Hobbs writer.

Adams looks f*****g uglier than TRUMP, so no wonder he supports him.

If Trump were a GEEK, and sat on the computer all day, he would like like a YOUNGER version
of Adams.

For some reason, I want to PUNCH Adams in his face, and split his f*****g DUMB Dilbert head in half

Give him a f*****g CONCUSSION.

This message is approved by THE DONALD
 

Afro_Vacancy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
11,939
http://offsettingbehaviour.blogspot.com/2011/08/discriminating-against-ugly.html
Obviously not news to anyone here, but there's a nod in the quote towards a study that found that attractiveness is something like 70% or so objective. I'm not sure of the exact numbers and I may be misrembering them, but there's evidence that we're definitely not just imagining it when we say that baldness, extreme shortness and other aesthetic maladies have negatively affected our life qualities in a tangible and significant way. I, for one, would actually support some kind of anti-discrimination law against the slightly-below-average to terribly-unattractive. Or at least something that recognises the privileges incredibly good looking people are privy to and did something to try and find some way of curtailing them. I'm not talking about romantic advantages here, but professional. Indeed, I would even go as far as to say that certain industries, like high-end fashion, in which someone's exceptional facial symmetry can essentially gift them an income for life, should be disbarred. It sounds incredibly draconian, but it's not as though these companies couldn't just use very life-like mannequins or computer generated images to model their products (rather than people). And live events like the London and Paris fashion shows, for example, add little to the material economy at all. They certainly don't produce anything of concrete value. It's basically just glamorised (and very soft) p*rn.

I'm more open to banning photoshopping of models, as it might lead to exacerbated beauty standards that are already particularly difficult on teenagers. The rates of anorexia among girls, and bigrexia among boys, are both high, and are also the tail end of a difficult distribution of body dysmorphic disorders which includes many more people suffering less.

I'm not sure about banning fashion though. I don't particularly care about fashion but it's an expression of human art.
 

hairblues

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
8,249
Could you comment on the last two sentences of his post?

Not really that just seems like his opinion of it from a 'moral' view point more than economical.

p**rn is a 100 billion dollar a year industry.
 

hairblues

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
8,249
I'm more open to banning photoshopping of models, as it might lead to exacerbated beauty standards that are already particularly difficult on teenagers. The rates of anorexia among girls, and bigrexia among boys, are both high, and are also the tail end of a difficult distribution of body dysmorphic disorders which includes many more people suffering less.

I'm not sure about banning fashion though. I don't particularly care about fashion but it's an expression of human art.

I disagree

I think something has to be done with kids teenagers development NOT to make these things the whole focus on their lives.

You cant control beauty or the exposure of beauty you can only handle how kids and teens process it and personalize it.
 

rclark

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,773
Well if my job as the Muslim Ambassador as a US airplane traffic controller doesn't work out, I'm going
to become a political cartoonist.

Politics and religion bring people together! :rolleyes::p:mad::mad::mad::mad: ;):D:p:cool::cool::confused::mad:

That's five colors in the rainbow. Put those colors on Trumps scalp, you get WHITE power!

I REALLY hope one of his kids is GAY, that would be great. In fact, I want Ivanka to get together
with Rosie O Donell. And have Rosie's egg in her. How funny would that be?
 

hairblues

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
8,249
Well if my job as the Muslim Ambassador as a US airplane traffic controller doesn't work out, I'm going
to become a political cartoonist.

Politics and religion bring people together! :rolleyes::p:mad::mad::mad::mad: ;):D:p:cool::cool::confused::mad:

That's five colors in the rainbow. Put those colors on Trumps scalp, you get WHITE power!

Jesus got beef with Trump :)
 

Afro_Vacancy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
11,939
I disagree

I think something has to be done with kids teenagers development NOT to make these things the whole focus on their lives.

You cant control beauty or the exposure of beauty you can only handle how kids and teens process it and personalize it.

So what would you do?
 
Top