Don't Be Delusional, There Won't Be Anything Better For The Next 30 Years. Deal With It.

How long until anything better (treatment, cure...) comes?


  • Total voters
    170
  • Poll closed .

Toby0823

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
159
Best thing we can do now is look our best with things we can control. There really won’t be anything coming in the near future. But it’s nice coming here from time to time to vent and talk with my fellow baldies.

If you’re fat, dress like a slob, or have bad hygiene then being bald should be the last of your worries. Nothing wrong with being insecure about hair loss, but you can still be proud of your looks if you’re on point everywhere else.
 

Johnt1997

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
429
I've heard that 2 - 5 years bullshit for over 20 years *lol*
If youre so well informed and experienced in the hairloss research world then why you asking lazy noob questions. If it's not a lazy noob question, then it's a leading question designed for you to give a smart answer like that.
 

Arrade

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,253
If youre so well informed and experienced in the hairloss research world then why you asking lazy noob questions. If it's not a lazy noob question, then it's a leading question designed for you to give a smart answer like that.
trunks rekt.gif
 
Last edited:

SpaceInvader

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
137
There won't be anything because no one GIVES A sh*t.

It doesn't affect them, so they could care less. Compare that to charity. If we were to ask for donations to random people for research and cure of Androgenetic Alopecia, no one will give a sh*t. I'm betting a good portion of them will shun you and say, "OH, they'll be fine. Nothing wrong with them." Meanwhile cancer or other bullshit donations won't suffer from this because it's viewed differently. In part, because these illnesses are seen as terminal, and they'll do whatever is in their instinct to save their "fellow man".

This on the other hand, is not something that can possibly happen to just anyone. It's genetic. It's not in their linage, so they don't care. It's not essential to survival to stop and help those of defective genes, when they can be selected out altogether. Much easier, and the mechanisms for recognizing and spotting inconveniences are encoded in DNA. The same can be applied to other conditions that don't kill you. This won't kill you, so it doesn't matter to them. They'll do anything to save your life, but not anything to improve it. It's not a requirement.

Doesn't help the fact that they f*****g call this a COSMETIC CONDITION. This is the kind of sh*t that allows just any prick to put out shampoo and market it for this. Also, the terminology needs to be specified. They'll give you crap like "Top 10 Ways to Regrow" or market a product under the umbrella term, and when people buy it and use it, and find out it doesn't work, and then they'll hear, "Well it won't, not if it's genetic" WELL OF COURSE they want the product for Androgenetic Alopecia, that's 99% of the goddamn cases. Just calling it hair loss allows bullshit products to continue to exist. This sh*t should be regulated, and it should be f*****g ILLEGAL to market something for hair loss that doesn't address any one the points that have already been studied.
 
Last edited:

Arrade

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,253
There won't be anything because no one GIVES A sh*t.

It doesn't affect them, so they could care less. Compare that to charity. If we were to ask for donations to random people for research and cure of Androgenetic Alopecia, no one will give a sh*t. I'm betting a good portion of them will shun you and say, "OH, they'll be fine. Nothing wrong with them." Meanwhile cancer or other bullshit donations won't suffer from this because it's viewed differently. In part, because these illnesses are seen as terminal, and they'll do whatever is in their instinct to save their "fellow man".

This on the other hand, is not something that can possibly happen to just anyone. It's genetic. It's not in their linage, so they don't care. It's not essential to survival to stop and help those of defective genes, when they can be selected out altogether. Much easier, and the mechanisms for recognizing and spotting inconveniences are encoded in DNA. The same can be applied to other conditions that don't kill you. This won't kill you, so it doesn't matter to them. They'll do anything to save your life, but not anything to improve it. It's not a requirement.

Doesn't help the fact that they f*****g call this a COSMETIC CONDITION. This is the kind of sh*t that allows just any prick to put out shampoo and market it for this. Also, the terminology needs to be specified. They'll give you crap like "Top 10 Ways to Regrow" or market a product under the umbrella term, and when people buy it and use it, and find out it doesn't work, they'll say, "Well, not if it's genetic" WELL OF COURSE they want the product for Androgenetic Alopecia, that's 99% of the goddamn cases. Just calling it hair loss allows bullshit products to continue to exist. This sh*t should be regulated, and it should be f*****g ILLEGAL to market something for hair loss that doesn't address any one the points that have already been studied.
People care because an effective treatment will make money! Yay for capitalism!
 

Johnt1997

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
429
There won't be anything because no one GIVES A sh*t.

It doesn't affect them, so they could care less. Compare that to charity. If we were to ask for donations to random people for research and cure of Androgenetic Alopecia, no one will give a sh*t. I'm betting a good portion of them will shun you and say, "OH, they'll be fine. Nothing wrong with them." Meanwhile cancer or other bullshit donations won't suffer from this because it's viewed differently. In part, because these illnesses are seen as terminal, and they'll do whatever is in their instinct to save their "fellow man".

This on the other hand, is not something that can possibly happen to anyone. It's genetic. It's not in their linage, so they don't care. It's not essential to survival to stop and help those of defective genes, when they can be selected out altogether. Much easier, and the mechanisms for recognizing and spotting inconveniences are encoded in DNA. The same can be applied to other conditions that don't kill you. This won't kill you, so it doesn't matter to them. They'll do anything to save your life, but not anything to improve it. It's not a requirement.

Doesn't help the fact that they f*****g call this a COSMETIC CONDITION. This is the kind of sh*t that allows just any prick to put out shampoo and market it for this. Also, the terminology needs to be specified. They'll give you crap like "Top 10 Ways to Regrow" or market a product under the umbrella term, and when people buy it and use it, and find out it doesn't work, they'll say, "Well, not if it's genetic" WELL OF COURSE they want the product for Androgenetic Alopecia, that's 99% of the goddamn cases. Just calling it hair loss allows bullshit products to continue to exist. This sh*t should be regulated, and it should be f*****g ILLEGAL to market something for hair loss that doesn't address any one the points that have already been studied.
You are right. If I was a fullhead I would not care, less competition for me as previously good looking suffer from a loss in aesthetics and removing competition for me. A cure for male pattern baldness however is money, money, money and that certainly motivates companies
 

SpaceInvader

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
137
People care because an effective treatment will make money! Yay for capitalism!

Except it's easier to put out a bottle of soap and water and call that a hair loss treatment than it is to actually fund legitimate research.
 

Arrade

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,253
Except it's easier to put out a bottle of soap and water and call that a hair loss treatment than it is to actually fund legitimate research.
People would catch on. Don’t let the Brotzu haters fool ya. They stand to make way more money with a treatment people continue to invest in
 

Toby0823

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
159
I’m more on the realist side and a bit of a downer, but 30yrs is a bit much. With the new research and discoveries, and hopefully more focus on cloning I’d say it’s possible to go from nw6 to nw1 in 10-15yrs. If it takes 30yrs then people need to get their priorities straight. Trips to the mars? f*** that, how about cure for cancer or hairloss.

With that that, I think people that think this Italian lotion (lol) or laser helmets will cure or at least regrow their hair are delusional. They’re the reason companies still try to scam baldies.
 

Duduu

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
205
There has never been so many people, companies and scientists involved exclusevely on hairloss research like we see today, some of them are promoting a common denominator but with different ways to promote hair regrowth (as an example, both follica and master Choi will use microneedling as a base for their treatment), meaning that we WILL have a view of how effectively treat hairloss in the upcoming years

This thread is bs, purely emotionaly based post out of frustrationm
 

Phatalis

Established Member
Reaction score
150
That Bimmler dude seemed overly pessimistic. We have Tsuji, Trinov, Replicel, Follicum, so THE Cure is incoming in 2021. No later than 2024.

I don't believe the cure will come for some time. Maybe an answer, but getting an actual treatment will be some years off.

I believe we'll have CB and Fevi to maintain though, at least until then.

So this dude was wrong most likely.
 

Phatalis

Established Member
Reaction score
150
Setipiprant is dead. Unfortunately.
Brotzu may not be effective...

Brotzu always looked like a crock of sh*t. Not sure why so many people ran after it.

Fevi/Seti/CB actually had some evidence.

Not just some dr who saw some anecdotal sh*t and immediately went to sell mode after a six month patient reported test.
 

Phatalis

Established Member
Reaction score
150
I put my hopes into CB. That seems quite good and they are @ phase III...
They say that it is a little more effective than Finasteride...

The compound is 2x stronger than finasteride.

The actual treatment I think isn't quite 2x but I'm wondering if this is based off dosage / vehicle stuff.


They still have a phase III to go through.
 
Top